postgres.git / summary / log / commit / refs
commit 658fad7ff0d1caa3b3fcb548fd6780c563f7ead6
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: Tue Jun 03 16:01:34 2014 +0000
First released in: 9.4.0, 9.1.14, 9.2.9, 9.3.5
Make plpython_unicode regression test work in more database encodings.
This test previously used a data value containing U+0080, and would
therefore fail if the database encoding didn't have an equivalent to
that; which only about half of our supported server encodings do.
We could fall back to using some plain-ASCII character, but that seems
like it's losing most of the point of the test. Instead switch to using
U+00A0 (no-break space), which translates into all our supported encodings
except the four in the EUC_xx family.
Per buildfarm testing. Back-patch to 9.1, which is as far back as this
test is expected to succeed everywhere. (9.0 has the test, but without
back-patching some 9.1 code changes we could not expect to get consistent
results across platforms anyway.)
src/pl/plpython/expected/plpython_unicode.out | 17 +++++++++++------
src/pl/plpython/sql/plpython_unicode.sql | 11 ++++++++---
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/pl/plpython/expected/plpython_unicode.out b/src/pl/plpython/expected/plpython_unicode.out
index 859edbbbaa8..c7546dd4587 100644
--- a/src/pl/plpython/expected/plpython_unicode.out
+++ b/src/pl/plpython/expected/plpython_unicode.out
@@ -1,22 +1,27 @@
--
-- Unicode handling
--
+-- Note: this test case is known to fail if the database encoding is
+-- EUC_CN, EUC_JP, EUC_KR, or EUC_TW, for lack of any equivalent to
+-- U+00A0 (no-break space) in those encodings. However, testing with
+-- plain ASCII data would be rather useless, so we must live with that.
+--
SET client_encoding TO UTF8;
CREATE TABLE unicode_test (
testvalue text NOT NULL
);
CREATE FUNCTION unicode_return() RETURNS text AS E'
-return u"\\x80"
+return u"\\xA0"
' LANGUAGE plpythonu;
CREATE FUNCTION unicode_trigger() RETURNS trigger AS E'
-TD["new"]["testvalue"] = u"\\x80"
+TD["new"]["testvalue"] = u"\\xA0"
return "MODIFY"
' LANGUAGE plpythonu;
CREATE TRIGGER unicode_test_bi BEFORE INSERT ON unicode_test
FOR EACH ROW EXECUTE PROCEDURE unicode_trigger();
CREATE FUNCTION unicode_plan1() RETURNS text AS E'
plan = plpy.prepare("SELECT $1 AS testvalue", ["text"])
-rv = plpy.execute(plan, [u"\\x80"], 1)
+rv = plpy.execute(plan, [u"\\xA0"], 1)
return rv[0]["testvalue"]
' LANGUAGE plpythonu;
CREATE FUNCTION unicode_plan2() RETURNS text AS E'
@@ -27,20 +32,20 @@ return rv[0]["testvalue"]
SELECT unicode_return();
unicode_return
----------------
- \u0080
+
(1 row)
INSERT INTO unicode_test (testvalue) VALUES ('test');
SELECT * FROM unicode_test;
testvalue
-----------
- \u0080
+
(1 row)
SELECT unicode_plan1();
unicode_plan1
---------------
- \u0080
+
(1 row)
SELECT unicode_plan2();
diff --git a/src/pl/plpython/sql/plpython_unicode.sql b/src/pl/plpython/sql/plpython_unicode.sql
index bdd40c40a56..a11e5eeaa21 100644
--- a/src/pl/plpython/sql/plpython_unicode.sql
+++ b/src/pl/plpython/sql/plpython_unicode.sql
@@ -1,6 +1,11 @@
--
-- Unicode handling
--
+-- Note: this test case is known to fail if the database encoding is
+-- EUC_CN, EUC_JP, EUC_KR, or EUC_TW, for lack of any equivalent to
+-- U+00A0 (no-break space) in those encodings. However, testing with
+-- plain ASCII data would be rather useless, so we must live with that.
+--
SET client_encoding TO UTF8;
@@ -9,11 +14,11 @@ CREATE TABLE unicode_test (
);
CREATE FUNCTION unicode_return() RETURNS text AS E'
-return u"\\x80"
+return u"\\xA0"
' LANGUAGE plpythonu;
CREATE FUNCTION unicode_trigger() RETURNS trigger AS E'
-TD["new"]["testvalue"] = u"\\x80"
+TD["new"]["testvalue"] = u"\\xA0"
return "MODIFY"
' LANGUAGE plpythonu;
@@ -22,7 +27,7 @@ CREATE TRIGGER unicode_test_bi BEFORE INSERT ON unicode_test
CREATE FUNCTION unicode_plan1() RETURNS text AS E'
plan = plpy.prepare("SELECT $1 AS testvalue", ["text"])
-rv = plpy.execute(plan, [u"\\x80"], 1)
+rv = plpy.execute(plan, [u"\\xA0"], 1)
return rv[0]["testvalue"]
' LANGUAGE plpythonu;
[parent: f998e9940065]