postgres.git / summary / log / commit / refs
commit 9438962ce32fd2fa437b5a447c40c5dac2ef9f08
Author: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
Date: Sat Jun 05 05:16:34 2021 +0000
First released in: 9.6.23, 10.18, 11.13, 12.8, 13.4
Fix subtransaction test for Python 3.10
Starting with Python 3.10, the stacktrace looks differently:
- PL/Python function "subtransaction_exit_subtransaction_in_with", line 3, in <module>
- s.__exit__(None, None, None)
+ PL/Python function "subtransaction_exit_subtransaction_in_with", line 2, in <module>
+ with plpy.subtransaction() as s:
Using try/except specifically makes the error look always the same.
(See https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/25719 for the discussion
of this change in Python.)
Author: Honza Horak <hhorak@redhat.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/853083.1620749597%40sss.pgh.pa.us
RHBZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1959080
src/pl/plpython/expected/plpython_subtransaction.out | 11 +++++++----
src/pl/plpython/sql/plpython_subtransaction.sql | 7 +++++--
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/pl/plpython/expected/plpython_subtransaction.out b/src/pl/plpython/expected/plpython_subtransaction.out
index 069f0992abd..d36aac127bb 100644
--- a/src/pl/plpython/expected/plpython_subtransaction.out
+++ b/src/pl/plpython/expected/plpython_subtransaction.out
@@ -236,8 +236,11 @@ with plpy.subtransaction() as s:
$$ LANGUAGE plpythonu;
CREATE FUNCTION subtransaction_exit_subtransaction_in_with() RETURNS void
AS $$
-with plpy.subtransaction() as s:
- s.__exit__(None, None, None)
+try:
+ with plpy.subtransaction() as s:
+ s.__exit__(None, None, None)
+except ValueError as e:
+ raise ValueError(e)
$$ LANGUAGE plpythonu;
SELECT subtransaction_exit_without_enter();
ERROR: ValueError: this subtransaction has not been entered
@@ -289,8 +292,8 @@ PL/Python function "subtransaction_enter_subtransaction_in_with"
SELECT subtransaction_exit_subtransaction_in_with();
ERROR: ValueError: this subtransaction has already been exited
CONTEXT: Traceback (most recent call last):
- PL/Python function "subtransaction_exit_subtransaction_in_with", line 3, in <module>
- s.__exit__(None, None, None)
+ PL/Python function "subtransaction_exit_subtransaction_in_with", line 6, in <module>
+ raise ValueError(e)
PL/Python function "subtransaction_exit_subtransaction_in_with"
-- Make sure we don't get a "current transaction is aborted" error
SELECT 1 as test;
diff --git a/src/pl/plpython/sql/plpython_subtransaction.sql b/src/pl/plpython/sql/plpython_subtransaction.sql
index 398c65720ce..572930f8bf2 100644
--- a/src/pl/plpython/sql/plpython_subtransaction.sql
+++ b/src/pl/plpython/sql/plpython_subtransaction.sql
@@ -158,8 +158,11 @@ $$ LANGUAGE plpythonu;
CREATE FUNCTION subtransaction_exit_subtransaction_in_with() RETURNS void
AS $$
-with plpy.subtransaction() as s:
- s.__exit__(None, None, None)
+try:
+ with plpy.subtransaction() as s:
+ s.__exit__(None, None, None)
+except ValueError as e:
+ raise ValueError(e)
$$ LANGUAGE plpythonu;
SELECT subtransaction_exit_without_enter();
[parent: eb231dbd80d2]