postgres.git / summary / log / commit / refs

commit    a0382e2d7e330de13e15cea0921a95faa9da3570
Author:   Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date:     Mon Apr 18 22:05:56 2016 +0000
First released in: 9.6.0

    Make partition-lock-release coding more transparent in BufferAlloc().
    
    Coverity complained that oldPartitionLock was possibly dereferenced after
    having been set to NULL.  That actually can't happen, because we'd only use
    it if (oldFlags & BM_TAG_VALID) is true.  But nonetheless Coverity is
    justified in complaining, because at line 1275 we actually overwrite
    oldFlags, and then still expect its BM_TAG_VALID bit to be a safe guide to
    whether to release the oldPartitionLock.  Thus, the code would be incorrect
    if someone else had changed the buffer's BM_TAG_VALID flag meanwhile.
    That should not happen, since we hold pin on the buffer throughout this
    sequence, but it's starting to look like a rather shaky chain of logic.
    And there's no need for such assumptions, because we can simply replace
    the (oldFlags & BM_TAG_VALID) tests with (oldPartitionLock != NULL),
    which has identical results and makes it plain to all comers that we don't
    dereference a null pointer.  A small side benefit is that the range of
    liveness of oldFlags is greatly reduced, possibly allowing the compiler
    to save a register.
    
    This is just cleanup, not an actual bug fix, so there seems no need
    for a back-patch.


src/backend/storage/buffer/bufmgr.c | 11 ++++++----- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/buffer/bufmgr.c b/src/backend/storage/buffer/bufmgr.c index a2b2c66a86a..939f5893432 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/buffer/bufmgr.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/buffer/bufmgr.c @@ -1198,9 +1198,10 @@ BufferAlloc(SMgrRelation smgr, char relpersistence, ForkNumber forkNum, { /* if it wasn't valid, we need only the new partition */ LWLockAcquire(newPartitionLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - /* these just keep the compiler quiet about uninit variables */ + /* remember we have no old-partition lock or tag */ + oldPartitionLock = NULL; + /* this just keeps the compiler quiet about uninit variables */ oldHash = 0; - oldPartitionLock = 0; } /* @@ -1223,7 +1224,7 @@ BufferAlloc(SMgrRelation smgr, char relpersistence, ForkNumber forkNum, UnpinBuffer(buf, true); /* Can give up that buffer's mapping partition lock now */ - if ((oldFlags & BM_TAG_VALID) && + if (oldPartitionLock != NULL && oldPartitionLock != newPartitionLock) LWLockRelease(oldPartitionLock); @@ -1277,7 +1278,7 @@ BufferAlloc(SMgrRelation smgr, char relpersistence, ForkNumber forkNum, UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state); BufTableDelete(&newTag, newHash); - if ((oldFlags & BM_TAG_VALID) && + if (oldPartitionLock != NULL && oldPartitionLock != newPartitionLock) LWLockRelease(oldPartitionLock); LWLockRelease(newPartitionLock); @@ -1303,7 +1304,7 @@ BufferAlloc(SMgrRelation smgr, char relpersistence, ForkNumber forkNum, UnlockBufHdr(buf, buf_state); - if (oldFlags & BM_TAG_VALID) + if (oldPartitionLock != NULL) { BufTableDelete(&oldTag, oldHash); if (oldPartitionLock != newPartitionLock) [parent: 75c24d0f7491]