postgres.git / summary / log / commit / refs
commit a692a2a183e184cc8cd7e6958f8110bbc25e1e22
Author: Thomas Munro <tmunro@postgresql.org>
Date: Fri Jul 09 05:51:48 2021 +0000
First released in: 15.0, 9.6.23, 10.18, 11.13, 12.8, 13.4, 14.0
Remove more obsolete comments about semaphores.
Commit 6753333f stopped using semaphores as the sleep/wake mechanism for
heavyweight locks, but some obsolete references to that scheme remained
in comments. As with similar commit 25b93a29, back-patch all the way.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BhUKGLafjB1uzXcy%3D%3D2L3cy7rjHkqOVn7qRYGBjk%3D%3DtMJE7Yg%40mail.gmail.com
src/backend/storage/lmgr/lwlock.c | 27 +++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lwlock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lwlock.c
index 1965e093b04..31ab24365da 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lwlock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lwlock.c
@@ -1211,14 +1211,10 @@ LWLockAcquire(LWLock *lock, LWLockMode mode)
/*
* Wait until awakened.
*
- * Since we share the process wait semaphore with the regular lock
- * manager and ProcWaitForSignal, and we may need to acquire an LWLock
- * while one of those is pending, it is possible that we get awakened
- * for a reason other than being signaled by LWLockRelease. If so,
- * loop back and wait again. Once we've gotten the LWLock,
- * re-increment the sema by the number of additional signals received,
- * so that the lock manager or signal manager will see the received
- * signal when it next waits.
+ * It is possible that we get awakened for a reason other than being
+ * signaled by LWLockRelease. If so, loop back and wait again. Once
+ * we've gotten the LWLock, re-increment the sema by the number of
+ * additional signals received.
*/
LOG_LWDEBUG("LWLockAcquire", lock, "waiting");
@@ -1378,8 +1374,7 @@ LWLockAcquireOrWait(LWLock *lock, LWLockMode mode)
{
/*
* Wait until awakened. Like in LWLockAcquire, be prepared for
- * bogus wakeups, because we share the semaphore with
- * ProcWaitForSignal.
+ * bogus wakeups.
*/
LOG_LWDEBUG("LWLockAcquireOrWait", lock, "waiting");
@@ -1588,14 +1583,10 @@ LWLockWaitForVar(LWLock *lock, uint64 *valptr, uint64 oldval, uint64 *newval)
/*
* Wait until awakened.
*
- * Since we share the process wait semaphore with the regular lock
- * manager and ProcWaitForSignal, and we may need to acquire an LWLock
- * while one of those is pending, it is possible that we get awakened
- * for a reason other than being signaled by LWLockRelease. If so,
- * loop back and wait again. Once we've gotten the LWLock,
- * re-increment the sema by the number of additional signals received,
- * so that the lock manager or signal manager will see the received
- * signal when it next waits.
+ * It is possible that we get awakened for a reason other than being
+ * signaled by LWLockRelease. If so, loop back and wait again. Once
+ * we've gotten the LWLock, re-increment the sema by the number of
+ * additional signals received.
*/
LOG_LWDEBUG("LWLockWaitForVar", lock, "waiting");
[parent: dd76aa54a3cf]