postgres.git / summary / log / commit / refs

commit    db2ee079f54c66f57b5cbfa4c506f73dae9dab1b
Author:   Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Date:     Mon Dec 18 21:00:35 2017 +0000

    doc: Fix figures in example description
    
    oversight in 244c8b466a743d1ec18a7d841bf42669699b3b56
    
    Reported-by: Blaz Merela <blaz@merela.org>


doc/src/sgml/perform.sgml | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/perform.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/perform.sgml index d3b47bc5a57..e7f17b9fa9d 100644 --- a/doc/src/sgml/perform.sgml +++ b/doc/src/sgml/perform.sgml @@ -388,7 +388,7 @@ WHERE t1.unique1 &lt; 10 AND t1.unique2 = t2.unique2; as a result of caching that's expected to occur during the repeated index scans on <literal>t2</>.) The costs of the loop node are then set on the basis of the cost of the outer - scan, plus one repetition of the inner scan for each outer row (10 * 7.87, + scan, plus one repetition of the inner scan for each outer row (10 * 7.91, here), plus a little CPU time for join processing. </para> [parent: 133d2fab2f83]