From: PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org>
To: pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
Cc: egashira.yusuke@jp.fujitsu.com
Subject: Is it typo of connection_name?
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 08:39:27 +0000
Message-ID: <156870956796.1259.11456186889345212399@wrigleys.postgresql.org> (raw)
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/11/ecpg-sql-connect.html
Description:
The "connection_name" parameter's explanation is not in Parameters
section.
Instead of it, "connection_object" parameter is in Parameters section. Its
explanation seems about "connection_name".
Is it typo about "connection_name" in Synopsis section, or
"connection_object" in Parameters section?
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: noreply@postgresql.org, pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org, egashira.yusuke@jp.fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: Is it typo of connection_name?
In-Reply-To: <156870956796.1259.11456186889345212399@wrigleys.postgresql.org>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox