From: PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>
To: pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Cc: dcb314@hotmail.com
Subject: BUG #15802: Comparison of a function returning boolean value using relational (<, >, <= or >=) operator
Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 08:56:54 +0000
Message-ID: <15802-f0911a97f0346526@postgresql.org> (raw)
The following bug has been logged on the website:
Bug reference: 15802
Logged by: David Binderman
Email address: dcb314@hotmail.com
PostgreSQL version: 11.3
Operating system: Linux
Description:
postgresql-11.3/src/interfaces/libpq/fe-misc.c:1060]: (style) Comparison of
a function returning boolean value using relational (<, >, <= or >=)
operator.
Source code is
if (forRead && conn->ssl_in_use && pgtls_read_pending(conn) > 0)
but
./src/interfaces/libpq/libpq-int.h:extern bool pgtls_read_pending(PGconn
*conn);
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org
Cc: noreply@postgresql.org, pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org, dcb314@hotmail.com
Subject: Re: BUG #15802: Comparison of a function returning boolean value using relational (<, >, <= or >=) operator
In-Reply-To: <15802-f0911a97f0346526@postgresql.org>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox