From: PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>
To: pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Cc: i.trofimow@yandex.ru
Subject: BUG #17948: libpq seems to misbehave in a pipelining corner case
Date: Fri, 26 May 2023 17:27:39 +0000
Message-ID: <17948-fcace7557e449957@postgresql.org> (raw)
The following bug has been logged on the website:
Bug reference: 17948
Logged by: Ivan Trofimov
Email address: i.trofimow@yandex.ru
PostgreSQL version: 15.3
Operating system: Ubuntu 20.04
Description:
As far as i understand, there is an invariant in libpq, that if
PQpipelineSync call finished successfully,
PQresultStatus will eventually return PGRES_PIPELINE_SYNC, or the connection
will be in CONNECTION_BAD state.
This is highlighted in several places in the docs:
1. "PGRES_PIPELINE_SYNC is reported exactly once for each PQpipelineSync at
the corresponding point in the pipeline."
2. "From the client's perspective, after PQresultStatus returns
PGRES_FATAL_ERROR, the pipeline is flagged as aborted.
PQresultStatus will report a PGRES_PIPELINE_ABORTED result for each
remaining queued operation in an aborted pipeline.
The result for PQpipelineSync is reported as PGRES_PIPELINE_SYNC to signal
the end of the aborted pipeline and
resumption of normal result processing. The client must process results with
PQgetResult during error recovery."
So i expect a code like this
if (!PQpipelineSync(conn)) exit(1);
while (PQstatus(conn) != CONNECTION_BAD) {
res = PQgetResult(conn);
if (PQresultStatus(res) == PGRES_PIPELINE_SYNC) {
break;
}
}
to eventually exit the loop.
However, if instead of expected "ReadyToQuery" response server sends an
error and closes the connection (
say, backend terminated by administrator or with a proxy in place and
upstream PG server being dead) this loop
gets stuck in busy-loop.
My understanding is that transitions in pipelining state-machine go like
this:
1. Initial PQgetResult call gets here
https://github.com/postgres/postgres/blob/a817edbf6f302c376f5c0012d19a0474b6bdea88/src/interfaces/li...
2. parseInput gets an error the server send
https://github.com/postgres/postgres/blob/a817edbf6f302c376f5c0012d19a0474b6bdea88/src/interfaces/li...
and switches the state into PGASYNC_READY
3. PQgetResult continues and here
https://github.com/postgres/postgres/blob/a817edbf6f302c376f5c0012d19a0474b6bdea88/src/interfaces/li...
advances the queue, so the Sync entry is gone, and switches into
PGASYNC_PIPELINE_IDLE later.
4. Next PQgetResult call gets here
https://github.com/postgres/postgres/blob/a817edbf6f302c376f5c0012d19a0474b6bdea88/src/interfaces/li...,
and pqPipelineProcessQueue switches into PGASYNC_IDLE here
https://github.com/postgres/postgres/blob/a817edbf6f302c376f5c0012d19a0474b6bdea88/src/interfaces/li...
Now we are stuck in the position where libpq considers the connection being
in CONNECTION_OK state
(because no reads over half-closed socket have been issues),
asyncStatus being PGASYNC_IDLE, pipeline being in PQ_PIPELINE_ABORTED state,
and the expected PGRES_PIPELINE_SYNC never came and never will (because
PGASYNC_IDLE, so PQgetResult returns NULL right away).
I am able to reproduce this behavior reliably via
https://pastebin.com/raw/4j3v3QzC,
linking against libpq5=15.3 and running the program against PostgreSQL
15.2.
Who is at fault here, is it libpq or me misunderstanding/misusing libpq?
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org
Cc: noreply@postgresql.org, pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org, i.trofimow@yandex.ru
Subject: Re: BUG #17948: libpq seems to misbehave in a pipelining corner case
In-Reply-To: <17948-fcace7557e449957@postgresql.org>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox