pg.ddx.io  pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Missing MaterialPath support in reparameterize_path_by_child
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2022 21:55:23 -0500
Message-ID: <1854233.1669949723@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)

Whilst fooling with my outer-join-aware-Vars patch, I tripped
across a multi-way join query that failed with
  ERROR:  could not devise a query plan for the given query
when enable_partitionwise_join is on.

I traced that to the fact that reparameterize_path_by_child()
omits support for MaterialPath, so that if the only surviving
path(s) for a child join include materialization steps, we'll
fail outright to produce a plan for the parent join.

Unfortunately, I don't have an example that produces such a
failure against HEAD.  It seems certain to me that such cases
exist, though, so I'd like to apply and back-patch the attached.

I'm suspicious now that reparameterize_path() should be
extended likewise, but I don't really have any hard
evidence for that.

			regards, tom lane

Attachments:

fix-reparameterize_path_by_child.patch (text/x-diff, 765B) download commit f74ca5d8611af3306eb96719d5d1910c9b6a8db5 Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Thu Dec 1 21:04:49 2022 -0500 Add missing MaterialPath case in reparameterize_path_by_child. Surprised we hadn't noticed this already. diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/util/pathnode.c b/src/backend/optimizer/util/pathnode.c index c77399ca92..224ba84107 100644 --- a/src/backend/optimizer/util/pathnode.c +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/util/pathnode.c @@ -4209,6 +4209,16 @@ do { \ } break; + case T_MaterialPath: + { + MaterialPath *mpath; + + FLAT_COPY_PATH(mpath, path, MaterialPath); + REPARAMETERIZE_CHILD_PATH(mpath->subpath); + new_path = (Path *) mpath; + } + break; + case T_MemoizePath: { MemoizePath *mpath;

view thread (10+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <1854233.1669949723@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../1854233.1669949723@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/1854233.1669949723@sss.pgh.pa.us

 ·  · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: Missing MaterialPath support in reparameterize_path_by_child
  In-Reply-To: <1854233.1669949723@sss.pgh.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox