From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: pgsql: Improve autovacuum logging for aggressive and anti-wraparound ru
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2018 12:35:54 -0300
Message-ID: <20180914153554.562muwr3uwujno75@alvherre.pgsql> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1g0aGi-0000uN-Sq@gemulon.postgresql.org>
On 2018-Sep-13, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Improve autovacuum logging for aggressive and anti-wraparound runs
>
> A log message was being generated when log_min_duration is reached for
> autovacuum on a given relation to indicate if it was an aggressive run,
> and missed the point of mentioning if it is doing an anti-wrapround
> run. The log message generated is improved so as one, both or no extra
> details are added depending on the option set.
Hmm, can a for-wraparound vacuum really not be aggressive? I think one
of those four cases is really dead code.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-committers@postgresql.org
Cc: alvherre@2ndquadrant.com, michael@paquier.xyz, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: pgsql: Improve autovacuum logging for aggressive and anti-wraparound ru
In-Reply-To: <20180914153554.562muwr3uwujno75@alvherre.pgsql>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox