From: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
To: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Cc: Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>
Subject: Re: Missing HashAgg EXPLAIN ANALYZE details for parallel plans
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2020 11:30:21 -0500
Message-ID: <20200708163021.GW4107@telsasoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAApHDvpsd7Un=ZGdLPDA4QFEEdtXSoiwTRG8Y3zr5JEFpMfhOA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAApHDvpEKbfZa18mM1TD7qV6PG+w97pwCWq5tVD0dX7e11gRJw@mail.gmail.com>
<20200618134514.GF17995@telsasoft.com>
<CAApHDvpsd7Un=ZGdLPDA4QFEEdtXSoiwTRG8Y3zr5JEFpMfhOA@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 02:02:29PM +1200, David Rowley wrote:
> if (es->format == EXPLAIN_FORMAT_TEXT)
> {
> ExplainIndentText(es);
> appendStringInfo(es->str, "Sort Method: %s %s: %ldkB\n",
...
> As for this patch, I don't think it's unreasonable to have the 3
> possible HashAgg properties on a single line Other people might
> disagree, so here's an example of what the patch changes it to:
>
> postgres=# explain analyze select a,sum(b) from ab group by a;
> QUERY PLAN
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> HashAggregate (cost=175425.12..194985.79 rows=988 width=12) (actual
> time=1551.920..5281.670 rows=1000 loops=1)
> Group Key: a
> Peak Memory Usage: 97 kB Disk Usage: 139760 kB HashAgg Batches: 832
> -> Seq Scan on ab (cost=0.00..72197.00 rows=5005000 width=8) (actual time=0.237..451.228 rows=5005000 loops=1)
I've just noticed another inconsistency:
For "Sort", there's no space before "kB", but your patch (9bdb300d) uses a
space for text mode.
+ appendStringInfo(es->str, "Peak Memory Usage: " INT64_FORMAT " kB",
+ memPeakKb);
+
+ if (aggstate->hash_batches_used > 0)
+ appendStringInfo(es->str, " Disk Usage: " UINT64_FORMAT " kB HashAgg Batches: %d",
...
+ appendStringInfo(es->str, "Peak Memory Usage: " INT64_FORMAT " kB",
+ memPeakKb);
+
+ if (hash_batches_used > 0)
+ appendStringInfo(es->str, " Disk Usage: " UINT64_FORMAT " kB HashAgg Batches: %d",
Hopefully there's the final whitespace inconsistency for this release.
--
Justin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: pryzby@telsasoft.com, dgrowleyml@gmail.com, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org, pgsql@j-davis.com
Subject: Re: Missing HashAgg EXPLAIN ANALYZE details for parallel plans
In-Reply-To: <20200708163021.GW4107@telsasoft.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox