From: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
To: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Missing CFI in hlCover()?
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 12:05:35 -0400
Message-ID: <20200724160535.GW12375@tamriel.snowman.net> (raw)
Greetings,
I'm looking into an issue that we're seeing on the PG archives server
with runaway queries that don't seem to ever want to end- and ignore
signals.
This is PG11, 11.8-1.pgdg100+1 specifically on Debian/buster and what
we're seeing is the loop in hlCover() (wparser_def.c:2071 to 2093) is
lasting an awful long time without any CFI call. It's possible the CFI
call should actually go elsewhere, but the complete lack of any CFI in
wparser_def.c or tsvector_op.c seems a bit concerning.
I'm suspicious there's something else going on here that's causing this
to take a long time but I don't have any smoking gun as yet.
Thanks,
Stephen
Attachments:
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 818B) download
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: sfrost@snowman.net, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Missing CFI in hlCover()?
In-Reply-To: <20200724160535.GW12375@tamriel.snowman.net>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox