From: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Zhihong Yu <zyu@yugabyte.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: pgsql: autovacuum: handle analyze for partitioned tables
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 13:01:52 -0500
Message-ID: <20210423180152.GA17270@telsasoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210422174346.GE7256@telsasoft.com>
References: <CA+TgmoaVOx7K0BE8xpR=_FwLGEP1kJoSx+oskCsVGmuJq5h4vw@mail.gmail.com>
<20210421230649.GA19244@alvherre.pgsql>
<20210422174346.GE7256@telsasoft.com>
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 12:43:46PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> Maybe the behavior should be documented, though. Actually, I thought the
> pre-existing (non)behavior of autoanalyze would've been documented, and we'd
> now update that. All I can find is this:
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/sql-analyze.html
> |The autovacuum daemon, however, will only consider inserts or updates on the
> |parent table itself when deciding whether to trigger an automatic analyze for
> |that table
>
> I think that should probably have been written down somewhere other than for
> the manual ANALYZE command, but in any case it seems to be outdated now.
Starting with this
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-committers@postgresql.org
Cc: pryzby@telsasoft.com, alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org, robertmhaas@gmail.com, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, zyu@yugabyte.com, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: pgsql: autovacuum: handle analyze for partitioned tables
In-Reply-To: <20210423180152.GA17270@telsasoft.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox