pg.ddx.io  pgsql-www@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
To: Karl O. Pinc <kop@karlpinc.com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Doc: Rework contrib appendix -- informative titles, tweaked sentences
Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2023 11:50:50 -0700
Message-ID: <20230409185050.GA949159@rfd.leadboat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230330012705.7295be34@slate.karlpinc.com>
References: <20230120191203.7nyqjbw3qe7xx4ru@alvherre.pgsql>
	<20230120191238.ds5l4ehuxve4zn42@alvherre.pgsql>
	<20230120142225.3d3be8a3@slate.karlpinc.com>
	<20230121081143.322bcf9f@slate.karlpinc.com>
	<20230122080903.693b171a@slate.karlpinc.com>
	<20230122144246.0ff87372@slate.karlpinc.com>
	<20230330043205.GA449577@rfd.leadboat.com>
	<20230330012705.7295be34@slate.karlpinc.com>

On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 01:27:05AM -0500, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Mar 2023 21:32:05 -0700
> Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 02:42:46PM -0600, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> > > v10-0001-List-trusted-and-obsolete-extensions.patch  
> > 
> > > + <para id="contrib-obsolete">
> > > +   These modules and extensions are obsolete:
> > > +
> > > +   <simplelist type="inline">
> > > +     <member><xref linkend="intagg"/></member>
> > > +     <member><xref linkend="xml2"/></member>
> > > +   </simplelist>
> > > + </para>  
> > 
> > Commit a013738 incorporated this change.  Since xml2 is the only
> > in-tree way to use XSLT from SQL, I think xml2 is not obsolete.  Some
> > individual functions, e.g. xml_valid(), are obsolete.  (There are
> > years-old threats to render the module obsolete, but this has never
> > happened.)
> 
> Your point seems valid but this is above my station.
> I have no idea as to how to best resolve this, or even how to make the
> resolution happen now that the change has been committed.

I'm inclined to just remove <para id="contrib-obsolete">.  While intagg is
indeed obsolete, having a one-entry list seems like undue weight.





view thread (48+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20230409185050.GA949159@rfd.leadboat.com>
Permalink:  ../20230409185050.GA949159@rfd.leadboat.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20230409185050.GA949159@rfd.leadboat.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-www@postgresql.org
  Cc: noah@leadboat.com, kop@karlpinc.com, alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: Doc: Rework contrib appendix -- informative titles, tweaked sentences
  In-Reply-To: <20230409185050.GA949159@rfd.leadboat.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox