From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: pgsql: dummy commit
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 17:34:50 -0400
Message-ID: <31072.1585690490@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1jJOQ8-0004k4-9W@gemulon.postgresql.org>
References: <E1jJOQ8-0004k4-9W@gemulon.postgresql.org>
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> dummy commit
Uh, what?
Also, I disagree with your change of the wording about savepoint
rollbacks. I agree that "if the savepoint is rolled back to"
is a bit awkward, but I think dropping the "to" is flat wrong.
The savepoint is a point you roll back to, it doesn't itself
disappear when you do so. That's why the SQL syntax is
"ROLLBACK TO savepoint" and not just "ROLLBACK savepoint".
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-committers@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, bruce@momjian.us, pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: pgsql: dummy commit
In-Reply-To: <31072.1585690490@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox