pg.ddx.io pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive help / color / mirror / Atom feed From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Jonathan S. Katz <jkatz@postgresql.org>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Cc: Shruthi Gowda <gowdashru@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: pg15b2: large objects lost on upgrade
Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2022 15:10:52 -0400
Message-ID: <3628089.1659640252@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw )
In-Reply-To: <CA+TgmobeOarNkFDc+QJONkCwn_ZZyVgiwFmX7jRhdK1Rz-QW5w@mail.gmail.com >
References: <20220730054401.GB3644221@rfd.leadboat.com >
<351616.1659192034@sss.pgh.pa.us >
<635c8809-3525-7dae-a1a1-0d9069cd86bc@postgresql.org >
<2657259.1659460333@sss.pgh.pa.us >
<CA+TgmoastyZUAmJ6t953=yycQxu_S0x6A08QVARsbOVAWW=D2A@mail.gmail.com >
<c07d096c-a67a-9fb9-2001-7a97b36aa5a7@postgresql.org >
<2686054.1659469199@sss.pgh.pa.us >
<98286e9b-8fe6-554e-c23f-d67a3df2c30d@postgresql.org >
<2687956.1659469881@sss.pgh.pa.us >
<CA+TgmoYqSrO-dSP6up31gv5F+1-zM-5exjKw2BU6w+FtzAzNhA@mail.gmail.com >
<20220803202014.77m6z5m7v525p2b4@awork3.anarazel.de >
<CA+TgmoYJaHNBghqALt-9FonK8FRB96m_MSNr9ev5EBto-2oMYw@mail.gmail.com >
<3128525.1659559617@sss.pgh.pa.us >
<CAH2-WzkmNN0kwPBO8t=waOCikWM4KLX9fWEYyt2oyWP08u3mSg@mail.gmail.com >
<ddf43511-32fd-fc22-1b36-8e6c733a55b0@postgresql.org >
<3260692.1659568781@sss.pgh.pa.us >
<CA+TgmoZkBcMi+Nikxfc54dgkWj41Q=Z4nuyHpheTcxA-qfS5Qg@mail.gmail.com >
<3447873.1659623176@sss.pgh.pa.us >
<CA+TgmobVx8h=1MbOPTd8ctXUG1kYUTsSidPpNrmEJbqOS+98UQ@mail.gmail.com >
<35731! 76.1659635346@sss.pgh.pa.us >
<CA+TgmobeOarNkFDc+QJONkCwn_ZZyVgiwFmX7jRhdK1Rz-QW5w@mail.gmail.com >
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> I think the most practical alternative is to put this file back to the
> way it was before I started tinkering with it, and revisit this issue
> after the release.
Yeah, that seems like the right thing. We are running too low on time
to have any confidence that a modified version of the test will be
reliable.
regards, tom lane
view thread (97+ messages) latest in thread
Message-ID: <3628089.1659640252@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink: ../3628089.1659640252@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on: postgresql.org/message-id/3628089.1659640252@sss.pgh.pa.us
copy link · copy postgr.es
reply Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, robertmhaas@gmail.com, jkatz@postgresql.org, pg@bowt.ie, andres@anarazel.de, noah@leadboat.com, andrew@dunslane.net, bruce@momjian.us, michael@paquier.xyz, pryzby@telsasoft.com, gowdashru@gmail.com
Subject: Re: pg15b2: large objects lost on upgrade
In-Reply-To: <3628089.1659640252@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox