From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: New standby_slot_names GUC in PG 17
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 11:37:54 -0400
Message-ID: <ZnWeUgdHong93fQN@momjian.us> (raw)
The release notes have this item:
Allow specification of physical standbys that must be synchronized
before they are visible to subscribers (Hou Zhijie, Shveta Malik)
The new server variable is standby_slot_names.
Is standby_slot_names an accurate name for this GUC? It seems too
generic.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
Only you can decide what is important to you.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: bruce@momjian.us
Subject: Re: New standby_slot_names GUC in PG 17
In-Reply-To: <ZnWeUgdHong93fQN@momjian.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox