pg.ddx.io pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive
help / color / mirror / Atom feed From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Cc: vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
Cc: Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>
Cc: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade and logical replication
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2024 15:44:22 -0500
Message-ID: <ZprQJv_TxccN3tkr@nathan> (raw )
In-Reply-To: <CAA4eK1LrO2qGcQot-9EgxpQRiT1O5+enHb57oN7OSNKSTn2hNQ@mail.gmail.com >
References: <TYCPR01MB120773E8D02D58F50B24DA6ADF54E2@TYCPR01MB12077.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com >
<CAA4eK1+sO6Td4kUnV-G7K_doZm4qERSLj-rw2vMBLUNh9=JBqQ@mail.gmail.com >
<TYCPR01MB12077B16EEDA360BA645B96F8F54C2@TYCPR01MB12077.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com >
<CALDaNm3h7ReG5wB9bhPpU=GpVp9Cfotx36tRErw5oKEXu+cKTA@mail.gmail.com >
<TYCPR01MB12077C4D38046B89599322EBBF54C2@TYCPR01MB12077.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com >
<CALDaNm1kdAnfx8N1AUQUuxc0zXbghFKi3-4vFAym_Y3hPOm1hA@mail.gmail.com >
<TYCPR01MB120778982E38315F541D61AD1F5512@TYCPR01MB12077.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com >
<CAA4eK1+B47ooT2HD1OTbSkVedK1BJLbr2K-seTd9pg9-wTgOdQ@mail.gmail.com >
<CALDaNm0z=fLtio1h50K8WossUGXU+gy0H9y9=RYh1DDZiq2EDw@mail.gmail.com >
<CAA4eK1LrO2qGcQot-9EgxpQRiT1O5+enHb57oN7OSNKSTn2hNQ@mail.gmail.com >
I've been looking into optimizing pg_upgrade's once-in-each-database steps
[0], and I noticed that we are opening a connection to every database in
the cluster and running a query like
SELECT count(*) FROM pg_catalog.pg_subscription WHERE subdbid = %d;
Then, later on, we combine all of these values in
count_old_cluster_subscriptions() to verify that max_replication_slots is
set high enough. AFAICT these per-database subscription counts aren't used
for anything else.
This is an extremely expensive way to perform that check, and so I'm
wondering why we don't just do
SELECT count(*) FROM pg_catalog.pg_subscription;
once in count_old_cluster_subscriptions().
[0] https://commitfest.postgresql.org/48/4995/
--
nathan
view thread (221+ messages) latest in thread
Message-ID: <ZprQJv_TxccN3tkr@nathan>
Permalink: ../ZprQJv_TxccN3tkr@nathan/
Also on: postgresql.org/message-id/ZprQJv_TxccN3tkr@nathan
copy link · copy postgr.es
reply Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: nathandbossart@gmail.com, amit.kapila16@gmail.com, vignesh21@gmail.com, kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com, pryzby@telsasoft.com, sawada.mshk@gmail.com, michael@paquier.xyz, smithpb2250@gmail.com, rjuju123@gmail.com, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade and logical replication
In-Reply-To: <ZprQJv_TxccN3tkr@nathan>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox