Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bu7lP-0000p4-Gv for buildfarm-members@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 00:51:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bu7lO-0008OU-Qf for buildfarm-members@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 00:51:18 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bu7lL-0008LP-Qk for buildfarm-members@postgresql.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 00:51:15 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bu7lI-0005dI-A4 for buildfarm-members@postgresql.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 00:51:15 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u9C0p9W0001875; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 20:51:09 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Andrew Dunstan cc: buildfarm-members@postgresql.org Subject: Re: buildfarm client release 4.18 In-reply-to: References: Comments: In-reply-to Andrew Dunstan message dated "Tue, 11 Oct 2016 20:24:34 -0400" Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 20:51:09 -0400 Message-ID: <1874.1476233469@sss.pgh.pa.us> X-Pg-Spam-Score: -2.2 (--) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: buildfarm-members Precedence: bulk Sender: buildfarm-members-owner@postgresql.org Andrew Dunstan writes: > * There is a new config parameter "wait_timeout", which defaults to > undefined. If it is set then any run that takes longer than the > specified number of seconds is aborted. That means that runs that > get stuck will time out, and the whole animal won't be stuck and > requiring manual intervention. My test animal has a setting of 3 * > 3600, i.e. 3 hours. There is some possible danger in this, that we > might miss bugs that cause us to get stuck, so at least some animals > should not use this feature. Hm, do you mean that if the timeout is exceeded, it just shuts down and doesn't report the failure? If there is a report I don't see how we'd "miss" anything. regards, tom lane -- Sent via buildfarm-members mailing list (buildfarm-members@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/buildfarm-members