Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 06:58:31 -0700
From: Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
To: Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>,
	Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>,
	buildfarm-members@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: many animals are running old clients
Message-ID: <20180830135831.GA1486647@rfd.leadboat.com>
References: <144264ec-fd45-80eb-7642-109f920286b9@2ndQuadrant.com>
 <CA+OCxoxrRmg+mAc1wGKQzT444=H4AHa8LTxHY1baSG8BMzTUCA@mail.gmail.com>
 <730c3887-5dd9-7149-4062-75ddc48388c0@2ndQuadrant.com>
 <25938.1535581043@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <CA+OCxow+ZMOKpWwZps-5KPMNrK66q31tw_kruBc3vy0LzPomxg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: 
 <CA+OCxow+ZMOKpWwZps-5KPMNrK66q31tw_kruBc3vy0LzPomxg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 11:32:30AM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 11:17 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> 
> > Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> > > On 08/29/2018 10:35 AM, Dave Page wrote:
> > >> It's very far from a 5 minute job on ancient Solaris boxes :-(
> >
> > > Please let me know when issues like this arise.
> >
> > One thing of the same ilk is that a few months ago I had to give up on
> > using https reporting on gaur/pademelon, and switch back to http.
> > I don't think that was your fault, because it was not associated with a
> > buildfarm client upgrade.  It appeared to me that the pginfra folk had
> > changed something to require newer TLS versions in https connections to
> > the buildfarm server.  Like Dave, I spent a fair while trying to install
> > new-enough Perl modules to fix that, without a lot of success: newer
> > Perl code doesn't compile on that platform.
> >
> > It's debatable of course how much anyone cares about buildfarm animals
> > that are this old.  I've already shut down pademelon since its compiler
> > never heard of C99, and I don't see much point in running it on just
> > the back branches.
> >
> 
> Right - I do wonder that about this machine (whether it's worth supporting,
> not whether its compiler supports C99). Here's what we're talking about:
> 
> -bash-3.00$ cat /etc/release
>                        Solaris 10 11/06 s10s_u3wos_10 SPARC
>            Copyright 2006 Sun Microsystems, Inc.  All Rights Reserved.
>                         Use is subject to license terms.
>                            Assembled 14 November 2006

The lack of any other Solaris animal makes it more valuable than its age alone
would imply.