public inbox for [email protected]  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed

data_checksums coverage
3+ messages / 2 participants
[nested] [flat]

* data_checksums coverage
@ 2022-01-13 16:18 Justin Pryzby <[email protected]>
  2022-01-14 05:50 ` Re: data_checksums coverage Julien Rouhaud <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread

From: Justin Pryzby @ 2022-01-13 16:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: [email protected]

Is there any coverage with data_checksums=on (initdb -k) ?

-- 
Justin





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: data_checksums coverage
  2022-01-13 16:18 data_checksums coverage Justin Pryzby <[email protected]>
@ 2022-01-14 05:50 ` Julien Rouhaud <[email protected]>
  2022-01-14 05:53   ` Re: data_checksums coverage Justin Pryzby <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread

From: Julien Rouhaud @ 2022-01-14 05:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Justin Pryzby <[email protected]>; +Cc: [email protected]

Hi,

On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 10:18:11AM -0600, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> Is there any coverage with data_checksums=on (initdb -k) ?

The build farm client doesn't support that as far as I can see after a quick
look at run_build.pl.

There's some coverage in the pg_checksums tool TAP tests, although not a lot.





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: data_checksums coverage
  2022-01-13 16:18 data_checksums coverage Justin Pryzby <[email protected]>
  2022-01-14 05:50 ` Re: data_checksums coverage Julien Rouhaud <[email protected]>
@ 2022-01-14 05:53   ` Justin Pryzby <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread

From: Justin Pryzby @ 2022-01-14 05:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Julien Rouhaud <[email protected]>; +Cc: [email protected]

On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 01:50:42PM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 10:18:11AM -0600, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > Is there any coverage with data_checksums=on (initdb -k) ?
> 
> The build farm client doesn't support that as far as I can see after a quick
> look at run_build.pl.
> 
> There's some coverage in the pg_checksums tool TAP tests, although not a lot.

That's what I thought.  I also raised the question on -hackers, so I suspect
we'll address that somehow.

https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20220113193238.xkzsnigg5gri5lwl%40alap3.anarazel.de

Thanks,
-- 
Justin





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-01-14 05:53 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-01-13 16:18 data_checksums coverage Justin Pryzby <[email protected]>
2022-01-14 05:50 ` Julien Rouhaud <[email protected]>
2022-01-14 05:53   ` Justin Pryzby <[email protected]>

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox