Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cOXSq-00084m-84 for buildfarm-members@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 03 Jan 2017 22:21:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cOXSp-0006xs-RG for buildfarm-members@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 03 Jan 2017 22:21:51 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cOXSm-0006uh-QU for buildfarm-members@postgresql.org; Tue, 03 Jan 2017 22:21:48 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cOXSj-0002aO-4s for buildfarm-members@postgresql.org; Tue, 03 Jan 2017 22:21:48 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id v03MLgls021317; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 17:21:42 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Andrew Dunstan cc: sfrost@snowman.net, glyn.astill@seetickets.com, craig@2ndquadrant.com, buildfarm-members@postgresql.org Subject: Re: git failures In-reply-to: References: Comments: In-reply-to Andrew Dunstan message dated "Tue, 03 Jan 2017 17:16:57 -0500" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <21315.1483482102.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2017 17:21:42 -0500 Message-ID: <21316.1483482102@sss.pgh.pa.us> X-Pg-Spam-Score: -5.1 (-----) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: buildfarm-members Precedence: bulk Sender: buildfarm-members-owner@postgresql.org Andrew Dunstan writes: > Recently a number of git failures have been seen like this: > *** Please tell me who you are. > Notably on Debian/Ubuntu machines. I assume they have had some sort of=20 > recent git update. No, I do not think it's the fault of the buildfarm machines. The problem is that Magnus got rid of a bad commit into the 9.2 branch via "git reset" not "git revert", cf https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CABUevEzrD-BYtQOQ22navkoWquOC5TcqPcBS= _iQ2cYqaK9_39g%40mail.gmail.com and these three machines seem to have been quick enough to see the intermediate state and get confused by it. I'm not very sure why "git pull" isn't enough to recover, but it evidently isn't. regards, tom lane --=20 Sent via buildfarm-members mailing list (buildfarm-members@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/buildfarm-members