Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1boh0z-0005Rx-1b for buildfarm-members@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2016 01:16:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1boh0y-00083n-5d for buildfarm-members@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2016 01:16:56 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1boh0x-00083g-Rj for buildfarm-members@postgresql.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2016 01:16:55 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1boh0o-000473-TW for buildfarm-members@postgresql.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2016 01:16:55 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u8R1GjKO028558 for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2016 21:16:45 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: buildfarm-members@postgresql.org Subject: Operational note: possible infinite loop in today's HEAD testing Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 21:16:45 -0400 Message-ID: <28557.1474939005@sss.pgh.pa.us> X-Pg-Spam-Score: -4.9 (----) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: buildfarm-members Precedence: bulk Sender: buildfarm-members-owner@postgresql.org If you run any PG buildfarm critters that are configured with --enable-tap-tests, you might want to check to see if they're caught in an infinite loop in pgbench :-(. If so, just kill -9 that process, and the next run should recover OK. The cause is a platform-dependent bug introduced in commit 12788ae49 and fixed in 9779bda86. A look through the buildfarm status says that the only members using --enable-tap-tests that haven't reported in successfully despite the bug are hamster, jacana, and topminnow. But I'm sending this out more widely just in case I missed somebody's machine. (Andrew: I wonder if we should have a sanity limit on how long buildfarm runs are allowed to take. Not sure what to put the limit at, though.) regards, tom lane -- Sent via buildfarm-members mailing list (buildfarm-members@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/buildfarm-members