Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pQbG9-0007ek-Is for buildfarm-members@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 10 Feb 2023 21:48:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pQbG8-0003eu-HE for buildfarm-members@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 10 Feb 2023 21:48:44 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pQbG8-0003el-BG for buildfarm-members@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 10 Feb 2023 21:48:44 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pQbG1-0008DH-KW for buildfarm-members@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 10 Feb 2023 21:48:43 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 31ALmZeh430374; Fri, 10 Feb 2023 16:48:35 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: "Todd A. Cook" cc: Andrew Dunstan , "buildfarm-members@lists.postgresql.org" Subject: Re: Help with failures on HEAD In-reply-to: <7250F6E6-DBBE-413F-8B54-F4217B06D615@synopsys.com> References: <5E0A4E81-CCCE-4267-A4A8-C6C1B93EE487@contoso.com> <3937519.1675968094@sss.pgh.pa.us> <7250F6E6-DBBE-413F-8B54-F4217B06D615@synopsys.com> Comments: In-reply-to "Todd A. Cook" message dated "Fri, 10 Feb 2023 20:02:44 +0000" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-ID: <430372.1676065715.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2023 16:48:35 -0500 Message-ID: <430373.1676065715@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk "Todd A. Cook" writes: > Thanks, I=E2=80=99ll keep that in mind if this ever happens again. Howe= ver, removing those things didn=E2=80=99t fix the problem. I suspect ther= e > might be something wrong with the Perl setup on that animal, even though= it hasn=E2=80=99t changed recently. Unfortunately, my Perl > skills are non-existent, and I have no clue how to proceed. Hmph. Wondering if something broke recently in the buildfarm code, I tried rm -rf'ing the whole buildroot locally ... but run_branches.pl got through fine. A couple of ideas: * Run through the setup process documented at https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_Buildfarm_Howto particularly "Check that required perl modules are present" ... maybe something went missing? * Diff your build-farm.conf against the current sample file and make sure there are no unintentional discrepancies. regards, tom lane