Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mAtpB-0003Zt-Tq for buildfarm-members@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 03 Aug 2021 12:47:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mAtpA-0002aj-Sl for buildfarm-members@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 03 Aug 2021 12:47:12 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mAtpA-0002ac-Nr for buildfarm-members@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 03 Aug 2021 12:47:12 +0000 Received: from relay8-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.201]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mAtp7-0002uZ-N5 for buildfarm-members@postgresql.org; Tue, 03 Aug 2021 12:47:11 +0000 Received: (Authenticated sender: adsend@dunslane.net) by relay8-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AC1241BF206; Tue, 3 Aug 2021 12:47:06 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: Release 13 of the PostgreSQL BuildFarm client To: Tom Lane Cc: buildfarm-members@postgresql.org References: <18c03f7e-3ab9-f7b4-9248-feb85b0f03ed@dunslane.net> <1660080.1627945870@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Andrew Dunstan Message-ID: <5462d8bd-b8aa-3c38-b078-4bf5e94f8eba@dunslane.net> Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2021 08:47:04 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1660080.1627945870@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk On 8/2/21 7:11 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Andrew Dunstan writes: >> I have pushed Release 13 of the PostgreSQL BuildFarm client. > FYI, this seems to have broken compatibility with ancient versions > of git. prairiedog and gaur/pademelon are both using > git version 1.7.9.6, and they both choked on the --prune-tags > option. I tried removing that, as it seemed possibly unnecessary, > but it didn't improve matters. > > I suppose I'm overdue to update git on these machines, but anyone > else running dinosaur versions may want to be cautious. Not so much dinosaurs either. I just tried on Centos 7 which isn't that old, and got a failure. Not just from the prune-tags but from 'git ls-remote' not supporting symref. I will come up with a solution in a couple of days, but for now please don't deploy unless you have a fairly modern git. If you do deploy, be prepared to roll back. cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com