Return-Path: X-Original-To: pgbuildfarm-members@lists.pgfoundry.org Delivered-To: pgbuildfarm-members@lists.pgfoundry.org Received: from localhost (unknown [188.227.186.44]) by pgfoundry.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2B04148A473 for ; Mon, 12 Sep 2016 00:49:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pgfoundry.org ([188.227.186.71]) by localhost (maia-lon.uk.hub.org [188.227.186.44]) (maiad, port 10024) with ESMTP id 39832-07 for ; Mon, 12 Sep 2016 00:49:38 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pgfoundry.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F02D148A46D for ; Mon, 12 Sep 2016 00:49:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u8C0nYDR007191; Sun, 11 Sep 2016 20:49:34 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Daniel Black In-reply-to: References: <411d52c0-247a-21ea-d1e5-1711c08c8616@au.ibm.com> <7deab5c6-ee6b-256b-ac1a-92c8b4bf3233@dunslane.net> Comments: In-reply-to Daniel Black message dated "Mon, 12 Sep 2016 08:29:13 +1000" Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2016 20:49:34 -0400 Message-ID: <7190.1473641374@sss.pgh.pa.us> Cc: pgbuildfarm-members@lists.pgfoundry.org Subject: Re: [Pgbuildfarm-members] docker instances of pgbuildfarm X-BeenThere: pgbuildfarm-members@lists.pgfoundry.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 00:49:38 -0000 Status: RO Content-Length: 900 Lines: 20 Daniel Black writes: > Relax, the git updates are done outside of the pgbuildfarm scripts. > Below is the start of the log that triggered the build this morning. The problem with inventing your own approach here is that your buildfarm members' reports do not provide any evidence of what they are building against. Please examine http://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_status.pl and note that your animals are not showing last-commit-id in their lines on the summary page, and if you drill down to their build reports, those don't show anything about "changes since last run" either, eg compare http://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=demoiselle&dt=2016-09-12%2000%3A36%3A03 http://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=guaibasaurus&dt=2016-09-12%2000%3A17%3A01 That greatly reduces the usefulness of the reports. regards, tom lane