Return-Path: X-Original-To: pgbuildfarm-members@lists.pgfoundry.org Delivered-To: pgbuildfarm-members@lists.pgfoundry.org Received: from localhost (unknown [188.227.186.44]) by pgfoundry.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6197F112A473 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2016 13:23:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pgfoundry.org ([188.227.186.71]) by localhost (maia-lon.uk.hub.org [188.227.186.44]) (maiad, port 10024) with ESMTP id 76615-01 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2016 13:23:34 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 Received: from mail-vk0-f43.google.com (mail-vk0-f43.google.com [209.85.213.43]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pgfoundry.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0A1B112A46D for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2016 13:23:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vk0-f43.google.com with SMTP id d185so54117190vkg.0 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2016 06:23:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=u0dQe9mTdGcGsLWjkn26XWc0/i0tqzpQDRvaYFt2VCo=; b=dtz3A4iB0y9NvFlra08fj1LetVzgcYzLRQoNPh8uo/N5yZTZ6UesUbxklC/0T+Xyn0 Lt6j4r8nRLgTONMko843QgQVvNBa1/gj6d64Qxeq7SvkgTXu8L78Hw+FZW8IyO7NIdcf ahnmS9tdSbcNDd/BlvWFbbbzTibbFA8a9lNlMYwDtsAfOnQx01ljJzyIbC1SvVonMrML PoKmpc+g4t1SCNVXl+yMwLbaHSY4hwmp+wB7P7sVeRgY4yTVUw4nC+UuTrqiU/lQgMUk 3ANcyjwMbQQhT+tbvNz2m9Parh3SnVjd8yqgS5WZZ1ruBXXjxQoclQythCwA65VAE4i+ 7T5A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=u0dQe9mTdGcGsLWjkn26XWc0/i0tqzpQDRvaYFt2VCo=; b=k4ZKeME9vuoAvlJFCA0hFVPEKvym/Ua9JzZ4Por3n8Pfod0zEFX1+mJOjA5OxB0lg4 fixYRqAV7pWIAGh5DZR6zwMb7OgNHKWPTwSAcLVoNPMiIgY/LTXrFUQaIjboXcQdbIbc 8SkmxYLq9t9WmCT0eMAXNuOFCBZWjN7FCGgphfxJ2kwW5q/Wxtl5Z2I6lrPO4hPVdP0X k2MWuLdrHKamNIff8rXsEon9jvaNtuNTAP+qTSOX+k94nMQJKMfa0PSEVQ1LoVvuvrsf 3CI6C1+bG6YgUKlUe/6032Fd1kX9v2cLsCkxJ5Od3mw389E7MizpATu1MrhiThbjp9qj jGUg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tKPxvOo8bO7oMl9qNncbWBL65LnmJf0byal1By9mIFaJ2pm0eHdyl9l4+1nfRqCjD0p8G+aUpFPnuyLOQ== X-Received: by 10.31.184.196 with SMTP id i187mr6581891vkf.34.1465824212788; Mon, 13 Jun 2016 06:23:32 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.12.199 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2016 06:23:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <14913.1463167636@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Josh Kupershmidt Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 09:23:12 -0400 Message-ID: To: "pgbuildfarm-members@lists.pgfoundry.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [Pgbuildfarm-members] Assorted buildfarm members AWOL for building HEAD X-BeenThere: pgbuildfarm-members@lists.pgfoundry.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 13:23:34 -0000 Content-Length: 1331 Lines: 34 > On Friday, May 13, 2016, Tom Lane wrote: > >> I noticed by perusing >> http://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_members.pl >> that several animals are up-to-date on building the back branches, >> but haven't built HEAD in some time: >> >> anole (72 days back) >> castoroides (74 days back) >> hyrax (165 days back) >> mule (275 days back) >> narwhal (48 days back) >> >> Please check that, if any of these belong to you. These critters are not >> dead, because they've all reported on one or more back branches recently, >> but they must be misconfigured somehow. Sorry for a little delay, hyrax is back running HEAD builds now. The problem seemed to be that this check was blowing up on the HEAD branch: https://github.com/PGBuildFarm/client-code/blob/68b1ed2d7832029ee654bec7468b388e3a61ef24/run_build.pl#L366-L367 since the old pgsql.build and pgsql.inst (not certain on the directory names anymore, I've lost my terminal output since then) were hanging around in hyrax's buildroot for HEAD. It would be nice if the buildfarm code could detect this case. I believe I'm PGBuildFarm running client version 4.15.1. P.S. I never received Tom's original message to this list though I did get three other replies in the thread. I've noticed elsewhere that pgFoundry's mail delivery is unreliable. Josh