Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([2a02:16a8:dc51::56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1frhU0-0005sC-94 for buildfarm-members@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 20 Aug 2018 10:32:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1frhTy-0006h6-QU for buildfarm-members@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 20 Aug 2018 10:32:22 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1frhTy-0006go-ID for buildfarm-members@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 20 Aug 2018 10:32:22 +0000 Received: from mail-pg1-x52a.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::52a]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1frhTv-0005fg-Cl for buildfarm-members@postgresql.org; Mon, 20 Aug 2018 10:32:21 +0000 Received: by mail-pg1-x52a.google.com with SMTP id y5-v6so6580055pgv.1 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2018 03:32:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=enterprisedb-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=bbEN6a4ClyMq/zumEuZ7V1redR52qp4ctJ8Csppl5Fc=; b=rBNc/3Fewj0ZYBnkGhUEbLwF+yEmpuQL9lpYEGAxHyODBxNcK5DZmQpBGhjSm9gsb5 pbQwopoCh7pqAWy+X3PremqoF359FLpkPcaVRjI3kxHbL1oa3/+LiPDXrOWZ2LqEyru+ Iq9L3YBBqjQQEVfUOqayv8f9qhNQ5dXoU5Oelle57MY4Zv4XlaJW7rz/LpoT4B3JGQg8 jFpvsybeWYS/lqITQJBoC6AWgW8D1FRFrv1Eq3qlpvnz7D530oUJFwEuBKRBOgogq8FB TEZmlnp/7k8yTp4wyCvKAy7bjWK8S90I8G0FmhWmtVHeHO5CGTP9oG3CcYNvA9g3P10c 9k+A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=bbEN6a4ClyMq/zumEuZ7V1redR52qp4ctJ8Csppl5Fc=; b=AW3OqRw86F8abIEZLJkCTl96MCKYqGwT9R2xLVBj5Xbn2qA4aziLvy7pt8VYe9pT/y hyfbTnvQ2MeUzWEdegFf2JtaqRfkrHMBLsAWQAO5Ksr0wWY05CHTLMDbuMNLKuZEnkT+ EErfcSjWVVKiOEHEsx3CLSfbmuf/j8uZW1FODEnE9zxROP8Sx/fTYo9WDtSFasm9i3BS bRq2DY1HpdSSPdmxPB5iDquBQWNcUHf27u6euZuTmCh5JWiJhttphRo2HB4QBLdxLSQv TUV3yaZN+q9dD8HYZV5LxsAZj4mcPlSRS88v3NK1BYeU5tVLcvVFXmLsWLINfnwBut41 C/MA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlHUGBPdblPdEOBQ9r9fD88l87AQpF0WnsSp0ak0TfILWuVueT6a XR6gJTEi7Jcx3iJVyb2zxaek3Mop/21MuwWSgqWHVZdekIA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA+uWPyCe5gIIoWoueQSr5+TV1A9h5fuW3y/4KRkAwLrEan85+29q3x73GJSNl+j/I/fI+bdw2hjBQjbAc1CwNkPS7w= X-Received: by 2002:a63:555c:: with SMTP id f28-v6mr6892318pgm.37.1534761138151; Mon, 20 Aug 2018 03:32:18 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a17:90a:9e6:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Aug 2018 03:32:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <32103.1534542673@sss.pgh.pa.us> References: <144264ec-fd45-80eb-7642-109f920286b9@2ndQuadrant.com> <32103.1534542673@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Sandeep Thakkar Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2018 16:02:17 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: many animals are running old clients To: Tom Lane Cc: Andrew Dunstan , buildfarm-members@postgresql.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000746c000573db6c44" List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk --000000000000746c000573db6c44 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi Tom, On Sat, Aug 18, 2018 at 3:21 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > Andrew Dunstan writes: > > The majority of buildfarm animals are not on the latest client code > > release. Version 8 was released more than 3 months ago. There are 26 > > animals on release 7 and 43 on even older releases, in one case on a > > release going back 4 years. See below for the lists of delinquents. > > There's also a depressingly large number of animals that still aren't > building the REL_11_STABLE branch. Some also have odd gaps in their > back-branch coverage. If you don't use run_branches.pl to automate > branch selection, please also take the time to check that you are > building the right set of branches. > > All my animals use run_branches.pl except 'clam', which is a PPC64LE machine. and when we setup this animal we found 9.3 was failing with "error: cannot guess build type; you must specify one". This was discussed in the thread with sub: "Include ppc64le build type for back branches". Therefore, I explicitly run run_build.pl for all branches (I added for REL_11_STABLE as it was missing). Once we disable 9.3 runs, I'll move to using run_branhces.pl on 'clam' as well. > > If this situation doesn't improve I'm going to have to reinstitute the > > server filters which will reject very old clients. > > While I'd certainly encourage people to update, I'm not sure why > that's necessary? > > regards, tom lane > > > -- Sandeep Thakkar --000000000000746c000573db6c44 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Tom,

On Sat, Aug 18, 2018 at 3:21 AM, Tom Lane <= tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> The majority of buildfarm animals are not on the latest client code > release. Version 8 was released more than 3 months ago. There are 26 <= br> > animals on release 7 and 43 on even older releases, in one case on a <= br> > release going back 4 years. See below for the lists of delinquents.
There's also a depressingly large number of animals that still a= ren't
building the REL_11_STABLE branch.=C2=A0 Some also have odd gaps in their back-branch coverage.=C2=A0 If you don't use run_branches.pl to automa= te
branch selection, please also take the time to check that you are
building the right set of branches.

All my animals use run_branches.pl except 'clam', which is a PPC64LE= machine. and when we setup this animal we found 9.3 was failing with "= ;error: cannot guess build type; you must specify one". This was discu= ssed in the thread with sub:=C2=A0"Include ppc64le build type for back= branches". Therefore, I explicitly run run_build.pl for all branches (I added for REL_11_STABLE as it was mi= ssing). Once we disable 9.3 runs, I'll move to using run_branhces.pl on 'clam' as well.
= =C2=A0
> If this situation doesn't improve I'm going to have to reinsti= tute the
> server filters which will reject very old clients.

While I'd certainly encourage people to update, I'm not sure= why
that's necessary?

=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0 regards, tom lane





--
<= div dir=3D"ltr">
Sandeep= Thakkar


--000000000000746c000573db6c44--