Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bfPLw-00012y-Nj for pgadmin-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2016 10:36:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bfPLw-0001qV-A7 for pgadmin-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2016 10:36:12 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bfPLj-0001XU-41 for pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2016 10:35:59 +0000 Received: from ns5.gunduz.org ([107.170.136.15] helo=ns1.gunduz.org) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bfPLg-0003kV-6p for pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2016 10:35:57 +0000 Received: from asus-laptop-03-gunduz-org (unknown [176.55.33.161]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ns1.gunduz.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E90FC3FCC9; Thu, 1 Sep 2016 10:35:53 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1472726152.8023.8.camel@gunduz.org> Subject: Re: RC1 did not hit website From: Devrim =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=FCnd=FCz?= To: Dave Page Cc: pgadmin-hackers Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2016 13:35:52 +0300 In-Reply-To: References: <1472725890.8023.6.camel@gunduz.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-XTwdd8e0Ou9fetH2p5Il" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.20.5 (3.20.5-1.fc24) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Pg-Spam-Score: -3.4 (---) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgadmin-hackers Precedence: bulk Sender: pgadmin-hackers-owner@postgresql.org --=-XTwdd8e0Ou9fetH2p5Il Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Dave, On Thu, 2016-09-01 at 11:33 +0100, Dave Page wrote: > > pgadmin.org still mentions about beta 4, it needs an update for RC1. > > >=20 > Yes. We always 'officially' release after PostgreSQL. For a moment I thought it was Friday. Sorry :) Regards, --=20 Devrim G=C3=9CND=C3=9CZ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com PostgreSQL Dan=C4=B1=C5=9Fman=C4=B1/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR --=-XTwdd8e0Ou9fetH2p5Il Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAABCAAGBQJXyASIAAoJENjDPf6Sz261qQoP/20aPrl85ga/J7z3vXT6FfM6 Mc7Cl5Pt/DTT1vgco/CGw1olDOTKUznj1OTx2pSQ0vvfUWdKAc0mJuM495Qx249N rZhDej57No8EQhcpZLY/24bbEjp3VBrgUaVajNr+KUJvKlXybrDBKB+psqCLUrW6 lpepu+wJjLzRQI6C+cr2cCL02xqhtCKQ8i9W5iX6Xy1smmymnBNGFtsdSkbYG1Yb 5k5hqE2eNIKho2XVTaqjCw9Msk4ZKORMLPqoVrXYno6xmzykgDPrIUxs0E4pf5Cm pDmYeciFpv6zgsgsgo2FmtnW5kRECpppL9OAmPP/wqlaN0WOVc4B3csNqjn6dOjR HXYb+6prdYN5IdO83r65Uhsn9odJOMsJOWE39+PN+WSoGbzrimBjzBMCbYa1iMlq E8KziiIEcdc1A9dPVERdlTUw+HKNysDRrYeI/bM3ORwOcZwalwfT/TEMpxRRRJPh 4jnyZKrJODf0WwN711dF8nxT+QHKryu5mOmcubqx/VYk4g93mDbOSHbU2WPLAiJ8 oTTSph38AnnCeywpGEFs4+qfZwyifItWEi2DLGvgTiUh6vqIkb5k+Ox9m4qacUMa FMn9INelXs1krf/k3VWGkmJGJNoA8YPQFFAAlKsbP+VcPt5AdaElrVDKxvRcbT06 ysmIXp+uRLu5nCFrs8DT =LBJq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-XTwdd8e0Ou9fetH2p5Il--