Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hSNXd-0005yI-DZ for pgadmin-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sun, 19 May 2019 15:16:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hSNXb-00005W-M0 for pgadmin-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sun, 19 May 2019 15:15:59 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hSNXb-0008Rb-FQ for pgadmin-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Sun, 19 May 2019 15:15:59 +0000 Received: from tamriel.snowman.net ([2001:470:e38f::11]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hSNXY-0002LA-P5 for pgadmin-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Sun, 19 May 2019 15:15:58 +0000 Received: by tamriel.snowman.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 94EBE5F79F; Sun, 19 May 2019 11:15:54 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 19 May 2019 11:15:54 -0400 From: Stephen Frost To: Julien Riou Cc: pgadmin-hackers@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: PROXY protocol support Message-ID: <20190519151554.GH6197@tamriel.snowman.net> References: <20190519142604.GA5843@thinkpad> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="zlIrrY2qAxn9R2IG" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190519142604.GA5843@thinkpad> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk --zlIrrY2qAxn9R2IG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Greetings, * Julien Riou (julien@riou.xyz) wrote: > My question is, what do you think of this feature? Is it worth to spend > time implementing it in PostgreSQL or not? This isn't really the right list for this discussion, this list is for discussing PGAdmin (the PG administration client) not for PG itself (that list would be pgsql-hackers). However, pgbouncer already provides this feature, so I'd say it's a good feature and one that you want from your connection pooler. Thanks, Stephen --zlIrrY2qAxn9R2IG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJc4XMqAAoJEO1sijiDR2RVyw4P/1yb0ZGWCWZm5+X0r70evXGd OFWClCGWkxonNA8DtyrPY928GUp/+jUhkpxXJ9Qo4abFln7zfmq8C3Sz7x+oBppH LQyWFJ2bo45Q9cGZlzTsjBDnFgOPM086bAqDRQJPcAfBWjwCpHrdj7l1l2162Lda Ci5suo5t3Sj4rrhGD/uYBxmQNu5u5UvzJqRx/ujDDMVycfKubiEyxzqbyLVTek0K AAIfZloIiY7NF0KTbQVIhseHQv+h2kpzJ+hQXSuzezyi8S604eobAMzzeSaZSiv2 qI3bMGtzNe6HlgIzsddWO4aWbw1LGprQbp92aZl1kYc4wl9VpdHK+/Fo3QO6VMMT WF5HcNArKFBbiFkmVpdyIiFrgxaVwZ7vKCcQL/NEcJJDsWATibdHLHdDFophTvsw cBMzcB5/Qe65Ef41h6z7xRJBXK8QPXt+EDv46FJL4RT/Cp/dDICbR5dr8I4+PQFt jNMY6Z9HHLqJ3m+Le+5H1lBe83e3QjovnykNjI28PYBcMADono8l7roEU3NXVb0g DNbKaUSHO3IEPm3bUudu7AtUDTyq+sAYuHBRLsWIoBlQ27kokZ+WdE5uTNAFDe5i LjvNfbRnJJk1D0iMp1eFQhuLkNXGPI0yTfCwRryxJD8+zeqBmar6vMMf/inSDSNx FUZ/uQRaU6LvN686DAPL =kU9O -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --zlIrrY2qAxn9R2IG--