Date: Sun, 19 May 2019 17:30:32 +0200
From: Julien Riou <julien@riou.xyz>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
Cc: pgadmin-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: PROXY protocol support
Message-ID: <20190519153032.GA13208@thinkpad>
References: <20190519142604.GA5843@thinkpad>
 <20190519151554.GH6197@tamriel.snowman.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190519151554.GH6197@tamriel.snowman.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Precedence: bulk

On 19/05/19, Stephen Frost wrote:
> Greetings,
> 
> * Julien Riou (julien@riou.xyz) wrote:
> > My question is, what do you think of this feature? Is it worth to spend
> > time implementing it in PostgreSQL or not?
> 
> This isn't really the right list for this discussion, this list is for
> discussing PGAdmin (the PG administration client) not for PG itself
> (that list would be pgsql-hackers).
> 
> However, pgbouncer already provides this feature, so I'd say it's a good
> feature and one that you want from your connection pooler.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Stephen

Good catch! I'm sorry. I will forward the conversation directly to the
pgsql-hackers mailing list for further messages.

Julien