Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1aHQKo-0006gj-1w for pgadmin-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 06:15:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aHQKm-0004cs-E6 for pgadmin-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 06:15:36 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aHQKZ-0004OG-0f for pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 06:15:23 +0000 Received: from palladium.wars-nicht.de ([89.238.64.91] helo=polonium.wars-nicht.de) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aHQKV-0000a2-T8 for pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 06:15:22 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by polonium.wars-nicht.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35A72114035 for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 07:15:19 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at polonium X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1, BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from polonium.wars-nicht.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (polonium.wars-nicht.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9HhRCR5MJA59 for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 07:15:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from diamond.wars-nicht.de (unknown [216.3.10.6]) by polonium.wars-nicht.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6D3D5114037 for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 07:15:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by diamond.wars-nicht.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A46081BE0146 for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 07:15:16 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: Updated Greenplum documentation To: pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org References: <568E021A.4050407@wars-nicht.de> <568E798C.2090206@wars-nicht.de> From: Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum Message-ID: <568F53F4.60907@wars-nicht.de> Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 07:15:16 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgadmin-hackers Precedence: bulk Sender: pgadmin-hackers-owner@postgresql.org On 07.01.2016 15:45, Dave Page wrote: > On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 2:43 PM, Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum > wrote: >> On 07.01.2016 13:49, Dave Page wrote: >>> >>> >>> What did you create the patch against? >> >> >> HEAD from git.postgresql from like 2 days ago. > > Hmm, I would have expected that to work. Can you rebase it please, just in case? > Just did that, and recreated the patch. Latest changes did not touch the files I modified, the new patch has the same checksum. Also, I can apply my patch to my working directory without any errors. Any idea why it is failing for you? Any reject files? -- Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum German PostgreSQL User Group European PostgreSQL User Group - Board of Directors Volunteer Regional Contact, Germany - PostgreSQL Project -- Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list (pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-hackers