Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gf0jo-0005bH-OR for pgadmin-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2019 11:00:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gf0jn-0002kr-GH for pgadmin-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2019 11:00:31 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gf0jn-0002kk-7I for pgadmin-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2019 11:00:31 +0000 Received: from ns5.gunduz.org ([107.170.136.15] helo=ns1.gunduz.org) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gf0jj-0006Wm-8u for pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2019 11:00:30 +0000 Received: from asus-laptop04.gunduz.org (unknown [188.214.13.46]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ns1.gunduz.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6B8273FCEB; Thu, 3 Jan 2019 10:59:39 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <97a942ad3ead4f9e441d149b531a001eebd0c743.camel@gunduz.org> Subject: Re: Packagers: Handling upgrade checks From: Devrim =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=FCnd=FCz?= To: Christoph Berg , Dave Page Cc: Sandeep Thakkar , pgadmin-hackers Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2019 11:00:23 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20190103095918.GD8340@msg.df7cb.de> References: <20190103095918.GD8340@msg.df7cb.de> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-5ucOkpaJduGFLI0G4gqT" User-Agent: Evolution 3.30.3 (3.30.3-1.fc29) Mime-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk --=-5ucOkpaJduGFLI0G4gqT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On Thu, 2019-01-03 at 10:59 +0100, Christoph Berg wrote: > > UPGRADE_CHECK_ENABLED =3D False >=20 > For Debian, I'll use this method. Programs "calling home" is actually > considered to be a privacy breach. Same here for the RPMs. That would also help if the RPMs are not released o= n time :-) Regards, --=20 Devrim G=C3=BCnd=C3=BCz EnterpriseDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com PostgreSQL Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR --=-5ucOkpaJduGFLI0G4gqT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEH8GKHNUOKtDEiyD22MM9/pLPbrUFAlwt60cACgkQ2MM9/pLP brVl+w//YlVvCS14167k6dKqbANAXs2vEfOmIA/c4hGDlteqwBcETEvrBxL2GgdO FnCXslyuJj80sd333J3etvtl2DSCleDZW7yA5fjMYTY/BiITNeigi1uJKGDbLI4V er838wnUTYGY5CrMObLywwOaEx0ROAI+iHQvxVIFz2J4ZApF3j7VljqhWPjwSvFJ fqqcbsAkcs8+u3eTJHc+E4BwJozmndnk5/UNZ7SCXIJwRAcDDF5n+G5bjx6fHWVw gch1UqMRNRznA1wQcfy2K34QoXdTidimbswfLEi5YtsqxgrDOG63AH5pYtEuBh0j NWWtIThk5+Ie/hnkNvhDqrYVM08HvI3C2s9ynmDh4QyEi5g7BOuomjpDBegUJly5 jpWZbJZHhuNMDxqdvhQCebao45CqAq8dinBvHrxqwkg3zsibYclkY1w2oNe874Wg paH0odnm6TzQA2vnXFevgEu3dLO4XKFikj/4qo4vzYeFm7rB7RYMf/fK/zZFW3s2 C45x05wm09MEH4HdI42RDIpN4OpKuSbW7SSVPvyBoDgNvi1zhjlJ9Jj2BYxuuQlx n7FiUbA7O7Xa/05dW8bc5VKI00YA0CTkKNksBsW8Gjh2QdFLMH14TGx7IcOth+6k itQvDLE7BE9KafJ558dIz2g+MY/gZnMFijEAfUCm3xEtzRoLUsU= =G6Y0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-5ucOkpaJduGFLI0G4gqT--