public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Dave Page <[email protected]>
To: Akshay Joshi <[email protected]>
Cc: pgadmin-hackers <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: RM-2519: Show the trigger function under the trigger node.
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 09:58:04 +0100
Message-ID: <CA+OCxoxAj5oqAAt+wqwe+w-dmz7aOfOBR4=Si5dZdhEQKeoEwA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANxoLDcU1MEMaxLru55deMk7JrLriwpB8JpmLht4jQeSwzz7KA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CANxoLDfHPBsNr_cPVBt+ua0=HNh9gn95VHPoo8C7RskCmCjmZw@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+OCxoy4kMaMAiQFW+PN2WMUBj14i4yLqsG_oi4c8KFW=g+DOQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CANxoLDcgcya2cSO-axRTJwKnBV1DVTLUYJiiYTKR_6M+nC6amw@mail.gmail.com>
<CANxoLDfzDL9w6QYxphZG-PDFj=pQ3bB3kO+SY9sDC-YvegckAA@mail.gmail.com>
<CANxoLDcU1MEMaxLru55deMk7JrLriwpB8JpmLht4jQeSwzz7KA@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 7:29 AM Akshay Joshi <[email protected]>
wrote:
> Hi Dave/Team
>
> On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 2:28 PM Akshay Joshi <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Dave/Team
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 10:17 PM Akshay Joshi <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, 8 Oct, 2020, 20:22 Dave Page, <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Akshay,
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 3:43 PM Akshay Joshi <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Dave/Team
>>>>>
>>>>> I have started working on RM #2519 to show the trigger function under
>>>>> the trigger node. I have made the changes to the code and the trigger
>>>>> function is visible under the respective trigger node.
>>>>>
>>>>> Changes made to achieve this:
>>>>>
>>>>> - If the trigger function is in the same schema then it works
>>>>> absolutely fine, the user can update the properties, view the SQL,
>>>>> Statistics, Dependencies, and Dependents.
>>>>> - If the trigger function is from the other schema then we need to
>>>>> change the schema id as we have a strict API route which adds the schema id
>>>>> where the trigger exists. Change has been done and it works.
>>>>> - For the trigger function from the other schema, I have added the
>>>>> schema-qualified name.
>>>>> - Remove the menu options and add a dummy menu "No menu is
>>>>> available for this object" when the user selects the trigger function under
>>>>> the trigger node. Have to do this because of the different API routes, as
>>>>> the object is not available and personally, I feel we should not show the
>>>>> context menu to create, delete, drop from there.
>>>>>
>>>>> *Note:* To remove the menu option completely I have modified the
>>>>> *menu.js* and check if the 'showMenu' function is defined. If it is
>>>>> defined then call that function and based on the return value, will make
>>>>> the decision.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please refer to the below screenshot for more clarity:
>>>>> [image: 2519.png]
>>>>>
>>>>> Thought/Suggestion?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, we should not be able to create/drop there, as the trigger must
>>>> have the function anyway (you can't define a trigger without a function in
>>>> PG, nor can you drop a function that's being used by a trigger).
>>>>
>>>> However, we should have a working Properties option I would say.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yes, it is working from properties tab. User can edit from there.
>>>
>>
>> I have tested it today and it works perfectly fine if the trigger
>> function is in the same schema, but if we edit properties of the trigger
>> function from another schema eventually that object is updated properly,
>> but it is not visible under the trigger node. The user needs to refresh the
>> trigger node to make it visible again. I am checking it how we can fix this
>> but not found any solution yet.
>>
>
> I tried a lot to fix the above-mentioned issue but due to our rigid
> node structure, it's been difficult to update and show nodes from another
> schema. One more example is if there are so many triggers that use the
> common trigger function and we provide the update of the trigger function
> from the properties tab then we will have to refresh all the triggers uses
> that function.
>
> As we already disabled the context menu, I would suggest disabling the
> "Edit" button on the properties tab to fix the above-mentioned issue.
> According to the actual request, the user wants to see the trigger function
> under the trigger node and see the SQL.
>
> If the above looks good I'll commit the code.
>
Hmm, yeah. How much work would it be to have a "Navigate to function"
context menu option that locates and selects the "real" function in the
treeview?
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
Attachments:
[image/png] 2519.png (272.4K, 3-2519.png)
download | view image
view thread (9+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: RM-2519: Show the trigger function under the trigger node.
In-Reply-To: <CA+OCxoxAj5oqAAt+wqwe+w-dmz7aOfOBR4=Si5dZdhEQKeoEwA@mail.gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox