Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1qWZSf-003g9o-T2 for pgadmin-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 17 Aug 2023 09:38:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1qWZSe-00Fj8A-Dw for pgadmin-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 17 Aug 2023 09:38:36 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1qWZSd-00Fj7u-SV for pgadmin-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 17 Aug 2023 09:38:36 +0000 Received: from mail-ej1-x633.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::633]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1qWZSZ-000bMq-PT for pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org; Thu, 17 Aug 2023 09:38:34 +0000 Received: by mail-ej1-x633.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-99bf91956cdso929678866b.3 for ; Thu, 17 Aug 2023 02:38:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pgadmin.org; s=google; t=1692265109; x=1692869909; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=jaeryIMzVwd77VsgkG7gRemOiDzO7mH9v5Oj4P4houg=; b=V/qYIz6XLdmo+T6hTJ9oXx1asYroGkRE8aW8gmD/ih/W9k58DJ2hNMoCzGWfrpkYk8 WkU2rmfISu86p6qwdm/loXwacOR3t6TqiiPPeUPK7IG8Ee+Sdk/WksjESfWGLc8DDnSi zwQgV7fqH4hXsBJ333bFfHXWfp5oug2Qcw4SaK5Z0OhXkV5O5J3WKAE4K5dzdyerEEq3 0FlmuYZyYpOj4rsZlpsm6WX+8d3uQY9iSj6+1Kqw750rL5u1NLfYQJCU9eqqriMrw+b+ EQAMDS2v9XJEDIiImCi5yOGyIQLXKBXWxYQV0EYxXj+/1iRIuzg/pvXYd2tRv5TNjRbn 4yOw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1692265109; x=1692869909; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=jaeryIMzVwd77VsgkG7gRemOiDzO7mH9v5Oj4P4houg=; b=jAuIIpgsxY+l+t+HstI8EHF3f1n/lOOVKxu541MP9gvo59MlqgiD7QkIblnkVQo2bG RUgniykf43oU5PiiKCufRhrHbo/KUlW8nDqoQfmrBu670m62T/sCp0JdaQfGDIByeSJa Zhr6C6XbS3k1EqwaSFbmCfWP4Z/cTP7W5Jmy2RPwuPmY5tz1+BqNd2cwFXMWC75v+7fb H/R8jZdQJORx+zwwe4qhc0l4cbC9ZAqDp/Vv94NaryFMqaO7jxY9ayIzNvtT1TaO3WSP ZSCfLbDFJ072A20DzHKBwgn1rbhNPWbdUBpA+O7RjvaHWKBbS6nWjJiq6zE1t/P8XfuE thGg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyM1IHozazwKiOpxWyVLgmqPtAFOLMiLnPxPWPC0eOwsh9QoJq9 U8wcLuugaKQu5fYWIVos0CCfpYzWm1ykOu9K2NBg8Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFNuk9aZ5R727w+geX7bWelaJGVFlU8gG7MBUWwOLtiP+W89KYsD1QTp7/AXhF18/6PXcjShVEM/6uKJ1+q8tY= X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:b15:b0:99c:20f0:deaf with SMTP id h21-20020a1709070b1500b0099c20f0deafmr2971374ejl.77.1692265108510; Thu, 17 Aug 2023 02:38:28 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Dave Page Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 10:38:16 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Pgadmin4 System Stats Extension Design To: Sahil Harpal Cc: Khushboo Vashi , pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a8ab5606031b2c34" List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk --000000000000a8ab5606031b2c34 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 17 Aug 2023 at 10:36, Sahil Harpal wrote: > On Thu, 17 Aug 2023 at 14:53, Khushboo Vashi < > khushboo.vashi@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > >> On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 2:50=E2=80=AFPM Sahil Harpal >> wrote: >> >>> On Thu, 17 Aug 2023 at 14:39, Khushboo Vashi < >>> khushboo.vashi@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Sample data of my system to fix this issue: >>>> >>>> 1. process331: >>>> 1. memory_bytes:null >>>> 2. memory_usage:null >>>> 3. name:"QuickLookUIServi" >>>> 4. pid:938 >>>> 5. row_number:331 >>>> >>>> Okay, so it is an issue of null value then. >>> Are null values being returned for all processes or only for specific >>> ones? >>> >> It returns null for some of the processes, not for all. >> > > Okay, great. So should we display null for those processes or 0B? > null. We don't have any info, which is not the same as 0B. --=20 Dave Page Blog: https://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com --000000000000a8ab5606031b2c34 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


=
On Thu, 17 Aug 2023 at 10:36, Sahil H= arpal <sahilharpal1234@gmai= l.com> wrote:
On Thu, 17 Aug 2023 at 14:53, Khushboo Vashi <khushboo.vashi@enterprised= b.com> wrote:
3D""
On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 2:50=E2=80=AFPM Sahil Harpal <= sahilharpal1= 234@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, 17 Aug 2023 at 14:39,= Khushboo Vashi <khushboo.vashi@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
Sample data of my = system to fix this issue:
  1. process331:=
    1. memory_bytes:null
    2. memory_usag= e= :null
    3. name:"Quic= kLookUIServi"
    4. pid:938
    5. row_number<= span style=3D"box-sizing:border-box;min-width:0px;min-height:0px">:<= span title=3D"331" style=3D"box-sizing:border-box;min-width:0px;min-height:= 0px">331
Ok= ay, so it is an issue of null value then.
Are null values being returned= for all processes or only for specific ones?
It returns null for some of the processes, not for all.

Okay, great. So should we display null= for those processes or 0B?

null. We don't have any info,= which is not the same as 0B.

--
Dave Page
Blog: https://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EDB: https://w= ww.enterprisedb.com

--000000000000a8ab5606031b2c34--