Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dKjAy-0001IR-Lo for pgadmin-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 10:35:56 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dKjAy-0002NH-8U for pgadmin-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 10:35:56 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dKjAx-0002N8-S6 for pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 10:35:56 +0000 Received: from mail-io0-x22b.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22b]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dKjAv-0000Vp-BS for pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 10:35:54 +0000 Received: by mail-io0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id k93so70754779ioi.2 for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 03:35:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pgadmin-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=OG1HBoMnUQYl3jKkB3Wwh8qb615Yq3p0qJL8RyxBoIQ=; b=VMPM8c9dLiNdVU7p14rTKz/WmcchaRunlYAMgMtfXcHo318CE/Ikv9u/kr5z+Wj7Cm UYz1DYafE6bOn+GQuZqN22doTf2avxm8vaITT5Vwz/iELbH5A1NiHMhct02C3I5wnmUi LOqM25kR9+YUSUY6yCdCc2AG17aa/egLqVoxXKtgrkPXrh3Y+k9Ws5Z3LiBWYm/FRkka J6BEsF8VqsK489eSTHVEaMab2r8l3Pd8oiE7SaRsNklC+QrmCCiGsJ5+Bt5pn3c4nh8f EmOHT267qQ2ZaKovx/AMAggspFAws05GGhf//AdnbIVUI/vpWDJcR2WoadgVKjCDP/Aa 4t3Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=OG1HBoMnUQYl3jKkB3Wwh8qb615Yq3p0qJL8RyxBoIQ=; b=b9Cl3YQmt62bp1AoM18zFSUNPk/gZVn9Bxe0xjmMtLN5FylS8gr8wb9CcW9sMmQE/P X3JV2qyf47fLLZ5PEIbcFcVg08KR7mpJnxQ5O1Zwa4hr7rp1UaLqXcFJvzBEmJq+W1ji cFN2UJjDQjvkU2DROxtlgEQ7G0Mw00Zwx3hRZwM5fnjFqb6qfunGyrkl8Kg6jRH/nS4s nQAuKyFPky1AkrfNzSJfBECM4rFv8ZqwJsWkLNRizR+c40+hQBL66Sr1K2BYVhRARHrb Od+Tvc7wf1G5W+1MP2kTCNYZ34/xSU3HETZU7Lmi+8dOpQfM5XK/4bxl9vVDR9qPsASc bGqw== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcBqZP5lP5PlVCaUYjYbRchOGNL+rQW5iISSLar+9/1ci8jjNYNH 3FMthi+q6FlxhjcoPPevWMmcpVDX4ihV X-Received: by 10.107.175.95 with SMTP id y92mr33097107ioe.84.1497350152406; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 03:35:52 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.107.174.147 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 03:35:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Dave Page Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 11:35:51 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [pgAdmin4] [PATCH] History Tab rewrite in React To: Surinder Kumar Cc: Ashesh Vashi , Shruti B Iyer , Joao Pedro De Almeida Pereira , Murtuza Zabuawala , pgadmin-hackers Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgadmin-hackers Precedence: bulk Sender: pgadmin-hackers-owner@postgresql.org On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 11:31 AM, Surinder Kumar wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 3:56 PM, Dave Page wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 11:22 AM, Ashesh Vashi >> wrote: >> > On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 2:47 PM, Dave Page wrote: >> >> >> >> And then I find a problem. Sigh. >> >> >> >> When running in the desktop runtime, under QtWekKit (the forked, >> >> updated version that is by far the best of the browser engines we've >> >> used), we get the attached error at startup. I don't see this under >> >> QtWebEngine, though as we've already found, that's not usable for >> >> other reasons. >> >> >> >> Is this fixable? >> > >> > As per 'http://qtwebkit.blogspot.in/2016/08/qtwebkit-im-back.html': >> > " >> > WebKit engine itself has not been updated since Qt 5.2 release. That's >> > why >> > it didn't support recent changes in Web standards that happened after >> > 2013, >> > including: new JavaScript language standard ES2015 (also known as ES6), >> > as >> > well as improvements in DOM API and CSS. >> > ... >> > " >> > >> > Could this be a reason? >> >> For the old webkit, certainly, but if you read further down, the >> version we're using has been updated and does now claim to support >> most of ES2015. > > In fact the modern browsers don't support ES6 JS so the JS files containing > ES6 code are first transpiled using babel into JS that browsers supports. Well, we *could* do that, but are we? I'm not sure the current code does anything more than lint and webpack it. -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list (pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-hackers