MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAMjNa7e3vkEsiRGqt6kw3Z+z6v-z6Ox4-F0VmCDJEGW2pynWOg@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAFiP3vxoqJ8Rd2fiXev2di1Se_WuyAZdMtUHcHG3HuHwk-vj0g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+OCxozZz4q4Cac8sS2wZ0OprfjOKQRqmSXQjHdd=-sBoVfsbA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAFiP3vxfQ4=+zjLW9HR_dtYkbgfZLvKLnLZi-A3m4rbFH_A5xA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAFiP3vznYPXdvmGj2J7i4S7e-BPUVWWUC5KFAK=Q7n6Nee5ThA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+OCxoza3djrtauF1VqSvqU1pXBr8gAzHD9xF1T37HbkbgEztA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAFiP3vyTB+ceHGxwXn_w8RBmDQn9SVC3i+1kXhv=CD8UWr3=Xg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+OCxowGax9fd5YmTG3u82Ums0rwkETiXFQPuBokKBx_Br8BOA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAG7mmozksaXEZv=Sz-f4vkHgDjn-_5LTBzP5=wP-+RNeCMVH3Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+OCxoy=cO2feBinWxO8hMuUN3x9+DFeKkDZ-5hv=2NWfht-dw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAFiP3vxq4-jHf0GALVH=eaQM5d+rrdu8Z49Q1ksL4ftKUzzVyQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+OCxowSS8R1zh1jajhhN6ibtH4x1+w=xwY5i11_Ub7zCJ9JFQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAMjNa7e3vkEsiRGqt6kw3Z+z6v-z6Ox4-F0VmCDJEGW2pynWOg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 14:33:15 +0100
Message-ID: 
 <CA+OCxoxbbVX6HZJVeXxRFhbkiG692RZx9WoWo=jmkv6gc79eRA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Fix for issue RM1336 [pgadmin4]
To: Adam Brusselback <adambrusselback@gmail.com>
Cc: Ashesh Vashi <ashesh.vashi@enterprisedb.com>,
	Harshal Dhumal <harshal.dhumal@enterprisedb.com>,
	pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgadmin-hackers-owner@postgresql.org

On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 2:29 PM, Adam Brusselback
<adambrusselback@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm just wondering what the thought process is for making the shortcuts
> configurable, or why that's going to be significantly hard? I find that to
> be highly desirable feature, one of the reasons being avoiding something
> like this from happening (with browser bindings). Some of us have other
> tools which are also unconfigurable and bind to the same keys, and now you
> have conflicts between them.
>
> However, what I think doesn't matter at all in the scheme of things, I'm
> just throwing in my $0.02.

It's not that it's necessarily hard, it's that there are only 24 hours
in the day to get things done. We've got a long list of improvements
to make - some immediate (i.e. in time for betaX - 2 being today in
fact), others for GA and others for future releases. Meanwhile, much
as I'd like to, I cannot keep 10 people assigned to pgAdmin
indefinitely. I do need to get them working on other projects, for
which there are also deadlines.


-- 
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


-- 
Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list (pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-hackers