public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedDrop support for Python 3.7?
4+ messages / 2 participants
[nested] [flat]
* Drop support for Python 3.7?
@ 2023-06-09 13:23 Aditya Toshniwal <[email protected]>
2023-06-09 13:33 ` Re: Drop support for Python 3.7? Dave Page <[email protected]>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Aditya Toshniwal @ 2023-06-09 13:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: pgadmin-hackers
Hi Hackers,
Beginning Flask v2.3.0, the support for Python 3.7 is dropped. So we have
pinned to the last version of 2.2.*.
We cannot stay there, and we'll need to update this. Most of the python
packages are dropping support for python 3.7.
So should we move ahead or stay put? I can see most OS's have at least
python 3.8 packages.
--
Thanks,
Aditya Toshniwal
pgAdmin Hacker | Sr. Software Architect | *enterprisedb.com*
<https://www.enterprisedb.com/;
"Don't Complain about Heat, Plant a TREE"
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Drop support for Python 3.7?
2023-06-09 13:23 Drop support for Python 3.7? Aditya Toshniwal <[email protected]>
@ 2023-06-09 13:33 ` Dave Page <[email protected]>
2023-06-12 06:55 ` Re: Drop support for Python 3.7? Aditya Toshniwal <[email protected]>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dave Page @ 2023-06-09 13:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Aditya Toshniwal <[email protected]>; +Cc: pgadmin-hackers
On Fri, 9 Jun 2023 at 14:23, Aditya Toshniwal <
[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Hackers,
>
> Beginning Flask v2.3.0, the support for Python 3.7 is dropped. So we have
> pinned to the last version of 2.2.*.
> We cannot stay there, and we'll need to update this. Most of the python
> packages are dropping support for python 3.7.
> So should we move ahead or stay put? I can see most OS's have at least
> python 3.8 packages.
>
Most? What platforms do we support that don't have 3.8+?
--
Dave Page
Blog: https://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Drop support for Python 3.7?
2023-06-09 13:23 Drop support for Python 3.7? Aditya Toshniwal <[email protected]>
2023-06-09 13:33 ` Re: Drop support for Python 3.7? Dave Page <[email protected]>
@ 2023-06-12 06:55 ` Aditya Toshniwal <[email protected]>
2023-06-12 08:02 ` Re: Drop support for Python 3.7? Dave Page <[email protected]>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Aditya Toshniwal @ 2023-06-12 06:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dave Page <[email protected]>; +Cc: pgadmin-hackers
--000000000000fb68e805fde934d7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Dave,
On Fri, Jun 9, 2023 at 7:04=E2=80=AFPM Dave Page <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 9 Jun 2023 at 14:23, Aditya Toshniwal <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi Hackers,
>>
>> Beginning Flask v2.3.0, the support for Python 3.7 is dropped. So we hav=
e
>> pinned to the last version of 2.2.*.
>> We cannot stay there, and we'll need to update this. Most of the python
>> packages are dropping support for python 3.7.
>> So should we move ahead or stay put? I can see most OS's have at least
>> python 3.8 packages.
>>
>
> Most? What platforms do we support that don't have 3.8+?
>
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Drop support for Python 3.7?
2023-06-09 13:23 Drop support for Python 3.7? Aditya Toshniwal <[email protected]>
2023-06-09 13:33 ` Re: Drop support for Python 3.7? Dave Page <[email protected]>
2023-06-12 06:55 ` Re: Drop support for Python 3.7? Aditya Toshniwal <[email protected]>
@ 2023-06-12 08:02 ` Dave Page <[email protected]>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dave Page @ 2023-06-12 08:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Aditya Toshniwal <[email protected]>; +Cc: pgadmin-hackers
On Mon, 12 Jun 2023 at 07:55, Aditya Toshniwal <
[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> On Fri, Jun 9, 2023 at 7:04 PM Dave Page <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 9 Jun 2023 at 14:23, Aditya Toshniwal <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Hackers,
>>>
>>> Beginning Flask v2.3.0, the support for Python 3.7 is dropped. So we
>>> have pinned to the last version of 2.2.*.
>>> We cannot stay there, and we'll need to update this. Most of the python
>>> packages are dropping support for python 3.7.
>>> So should we move ahead or stay put? I can see most OS's have at least
>>> python 3.8 packages.
>>>
>>
>> Most? What platforms do we support that don't have 3.8+?
>>
> From what we support, only Debian 10(Buster) do not have a 3.8+ python
> release.
>
Hmm, well Buster has just moved into LTS, where it'll be for about another
year. I'm on the fence about whether we should de-support it now; it's
still in common use AFAIA - in fact postgresql.org still has a handful of
installations that have yet to be moved to Bullseye.
--
Dave Page
Blog: https://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-06-12 08:02 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-06-09 13:23 Drop support for Python 3.7? Aditya Toshniwal <[email protected]>
2023-06-09 13:33 ` Dave Page <[email protected]>
2023-06-12 06:55 ` Aditya Toshniwal <[email protected]>
2023-06-12 08:02 ` Dave Page <[email protected]>
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox