Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jLmcC-0004e2-P9 for pgadmin-support@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 07 Apr 2020 11:42:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jLmcB-00037M-LF for pgadmin-support@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 07 Apr 2020 11:41:59 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jLmcB-00037F-FH for pgadmin-support@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 07 Apr 2020 11:41:59 +0000 Received: from mail-qv1-xf44.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::f44]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jLmc9-0004dW-Ld for pgadmin-support@postgresql.org; Tue, 07 Apr 2020 11:41:59 +0000 Received: by mail-qv1-xf44.google.com with SMTP id z13so1631178qvw.3 for ; Tue, 07 Apr 2020 04:41:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=HwC8Sm8eY3O3tFGKies0lrKI6DDdzmrp9/ns1Eaaipw=; b=j3+L0GLaRaiEWz1Ci45qEzZOg4p2QniFs2wWyy8lMz0t/kQlawLn/hv9/TnStYLibw +8ysV8v4t7LygZOA69i1G3b895deJtbnzdqT3VngxHLpCi7OU0aZGswe527YR7gmo8gI aLUR5++cuXoumoSLWYVMSFGdv8o1LLw/i0V3oXVkV5zpxhjT/H64oiiX9NDxR0XbqzvZ Il0pY/t4LMGAuiUqdiM4Ts562+WzYrqbB9OKNgcjDZvajDTU338sv1mtsFtnFho3ia3c p3inu4BSy42VPXx+v/p41Co8bMEnzeG7hQvtpfVJbRUmC2mo+Op3xGmneUcWxRc2I1tv II5A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=HwC8Sm8eY3O3tFGKies0lrKI6DDdzmrp9/ns1Eaaipw=; b=uW/p1wWLmOwmeN1pBXidKAKZuovWs3yIyuAYi8g+aiu/9HmCDt7FNeN/wpswATLuw6 +MPwwuDDVkUT5P228PfUMLlqnMFGNqGl4YYaDL9KWs5EiWSECfNbmUqPRUtIwDXalx8W QE2lqhTAT9jflKAcH+ddq8C8WroMsE+MuVxjJwOQP0wSk+ir/SKKOOuYik5bY/f+D/mI dkcdPorPykglmuyZwLdtITGGUUuotU7ODVP+MkSj4ZWhFaJM08HW9o97AsaTS1SKjOhu y8intKu92vWS6qfpKLGCUtYr2FUmC6f8OoKEdQsG2107Ko0qirdDGonL+37OcsUZgWpZ AqEA== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuY5Rr1whajxrWw0ZIQRuYM0ZevLAuwQpxI2mmvzol2x68vvtOOk 7gd1ewdHX+T6dk+wayVV8yhCTeL68GpRDXPnCCk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypLdOMlG5aL01FROgMCtekbTaOloPjswmmpQl9YLv4PBtASmDalBDK1UKDNlz+RCRViHZ8E5s0ZxolQVW7g8bRk= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:ab0:: with SMTP id ew16mr1672002qvb.35.1586259715839; Tue, 07 Apr 2020 04:41:55 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Dave Caughey Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2020 07:41:44 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Proposal: Drop support for Internet Explorer To: Dave Page Cc: pgAdmin Support , pgadmin-hackers Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e25a2805a2b1dea3" List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk --000000000000e25a2805a2b1dea3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Check the analytics... I think you'll find dropping it is a non-issue. In my own web service, I found that IE (all versions) constituted only about 1% of my users. So I dropped support for IE (since it was preventing me from fully adopting ES6), and there was not a single complaint from my users. Cheers, Dave On Tue., Apr. 7, 2020, 3:36 a.m. Dave Page, wrote: > All, > > Internet Explorer has long been superseded by Microsoft Edge, and even > that has recently moved to using Chromium as it's core engine. Version 11 > was originally released in 2013, and though Microsoft have committed to > supporting it until 2025, as far as I can tell there have been no notable > new features in almost it's entire lifetime, and certainly in recent years > Microsoft have only been releasing security fixes. > > As you can imagine, supporting Internet Explorer has a non-trivial cost to > it for the pgAdmin project. Not only do we need to test with it as well as > Edge, but we also need to write code, CSS and HTML that is fully compatible > with what essentially is a 7 year old browser. By comparison, for all > other browsers we typically aim to support releases no more than 2 years > old. > > I therefore propose that we officially drop support for Internet Explorer. > Practically this means that we would not test with it, and anyone reporting > a bug with it would be told to use an alternate browser. > > Objections/comments please? > > Thanks! > > -- > Dave Page > Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com > Twitter: @pgsnake > > EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com > The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company > --000000000000e25a2805a2b1dea3 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Check the analytics... I think you'll find dropp= ing it is a non-issue. In my own web service, I found that IE (all versions= ) constituted only about 1% of my users.=C2=A0

<= /div>
So I dropped support for IE (since it was preventing= me from fully adopting ES6), and there was not a single complaint from my = users.=C2=A0

Cheers,=C2= =A0
Dave

On Tue., Apr. 7, 2020, 3:36 a.m. = Dave Page, <dpage@pgadmin.org&g= t; wrote:
All,
Internet Explorer has long been superseded=C2=A0by Microsof= t Edge, and even that has recently moved to using Chromium as it's core= engine. Version 11 was originally released in 2013, and though Microsoft h= ave committed to supporting it until 2025, as far as I can tell there have = been no notable new features in almost it's entire lifetime, and certai= nly in recent years Microsoft have only been releasing=C2=A0security fixes.=

As you can imagine, supporting Internet Explorer = has a non-trivial cost to it for the pgAdmin project. Not only do we need t= o test with it as well as Edge, but we also need to write code, CSS and HTM= L that is fully compatible with what essentially is a 7 year old browser. B= y comparison, for all other=C2=A0browsers we typically aim to support relea= ses no more than 2 years old.

I therefore propose = that we officially drop support for Internet Explorer. Practically this mea= ns that we would not test with it, and anyone reporting a bug with it would= be told to use an alternate browser.

Objections/c= omments please?

Thanks!

=
--
Dave Page<= br>Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

Ente= rpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQ= L Company
--000000000000e25a2805a2b1dea3--