Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jM4qm-0000jZ-5a for pgadmin-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 08 Apr 2020 07:10:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jM4qk-000724-UF for pgadmin-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 08 Apr 2020 07:10:14 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jM4qk-00070G-Oa for pgadmin-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 08 Apr 2020 07:10:14 +0000 Received: from mail-ot1-x335.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::335]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jM4qi-0006BH-MF for pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org; Wed, 08 Apr 2020 07:10:14 +0000 Received: by mail-ot1-x335.google.com with SMTP id x11so5817579otp.6 for ; Wed, 08 Apr 2020 00:10:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=enterprisedb-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=FHwsmHhfVTeID6VoJWsF/N8sOco949OstVMJnlCEX90=; b=ZtPy0JPa5Z7gFwciDFx9USddXfxNexphojVjGy4Re8L1hi0pPmbDNXAum80QgotyXP mEhqaOOfHU8MefHmAnpInJJOSak3TEax8z/Mzh5eIzOBcnV2tESElWT4g33Ce1937MJx 8hy63wG6xV9ucYHVSenn7iaiqCXXfqgOnl/AoI79K5j8v+YnuSRzIrPa/WbYlwD8iySP Gcuys6SLcMrX6C07sO7qraxkCD21yxjccXUg1D82HUElcLkkZ5kBZ+i9QCBjMA4dOD3r 0gCza3CHVGidELTEWMLFc32MOr8lfw5m7+chc+fszFfZ/b7PT9L88x2meR/HYrzrRzWI eUwA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=FHwsmHhfVTeID6VoJWsF/N8sOco949OstVMJnlCEX90=; b=fE87rhPGDsap6o9XDL6lZT1ZzJQSq7ge6EmproULz1AuqKe99BHVCn7DYTxUH5suk/ 9qFq/ChxU3+FhO4Yfrb42gGPbBDmxeId36tEO+wWzdv0/+0RKd5sOLS86eKDlozKeJA2 lCZno49f5pU5A1ZzzJWUQHlZoFCCGvn86sFlkPEjplaGLBNeQnAQgnBW0+G4ssnoBkDP DGZCePU9gXcNa0HZx0cbeHz9WU+FcUV63IUR3Ixn3FuiSp3FWMC47rPcWTWWqzi39PIL 2YTej+LNNL2TBxsLw4RI4la+13wQoITyQK5KgwhDzQ8/ughoPiBuaXg3bZDCUggEZaQP aVXg== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuaF4j9W8xbcWWNV76/YDLtfo1CSuGjnKZ6S9UOiaYFoc16psP3l c1JnTas0ZPt8WwQAiIg8I5Q7UyC0KjVndc9ziFhVNB77WZaTWMutIOYbJe5b8FbicSXn1ebP/If YBhuYNFvE3oeqzQYWkrcqV4cUPYhzyX60Gz7x2UDhpu3oVicDegEt/AjvMBLsP4v5yxV6EjgJRl +XNXkLchPD6u4rxXoPH3puHEem/OUASW7oEWHCccuRcry9vDj2Rcs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypIY7tkE4lCBmjaOHd5hPuNNhYewoud3pbx1zy87XgsnoX+85+rWEwo8sFyZhb+L2v2noIsL5469VFunIfPDBgQ= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:1786:: with SMTP id j6mr4445556otj.235.1586329810026; Wed, 08 Apr 2020 00:10:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Ashesh Vashi Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2020 12:39:59 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [pgAdmin4][Patch] - RM 5270 - [EPAS] Synonym properties does not show OID. To: Khushboo Vashi Cc: pgadmin-hackers Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d2f19c05a2c23063" X-CLOUD-SEC-AV-Info: edb,google_mail,monitor X-CLOUD-SEC-AV-Sent: true X-Gm-Spam: 0 X-Gm-Phishy: 0 List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk --000000000000d2f19c05a2c23063 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 6:37 PM Khushboo Vashi < khushboo.vashi@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Please find the attached patch to fix the RM # 5270 - [EPAS] Synonym > properties does not show OID. > > As per the current implementation, we completely ignored OID and instead > considered the name as the unique field, now with this patch OID will be > used as an unique id and also will display OID in the properties tab. > Question is: When we rename a synonym, does it create a new OID, or keep the same? -- Ashesh > > Thanks, > Khushboo > > --000000000000d2f19c05a2c23063 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 6:37 PM Khushboo V= ashi <khushboo.vashi@= enterprisedb.com> wrote:
Hi,

Please find the attached patch to fix the RM # 527= 0 -=C2=A0[EPAS] Synonym properties does not show OID.

<= font color=3D"#000000" face=3D"arial, sans-serif">As per the current implem= entation, we completely ignored OID and instead considered the name as the = unique field, now with this patch OID will be used as an unique id and also= will display OID in the properties tab.
Question is: When we rename a synonym, does it create a new OID, or keep = the same?

-- Ashesh

Thanks,
Khushboo
--000000000000d2f19c05a2c23063--