BTW; Ashesh, can you please ensure there's an RM ticket for this, as it's obviously of interest to users.Thanks.On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 9:06 AM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 9:00 AM, Ashesh Vashi <ashesh.vashi@enterprisedb.com> wrote:On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 1:29 PM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 8:56 AM, Ashesh Vashi <ashesh.vashi@enterprisedb.com> wrote:Thanks.Committed!I agree with the change from a preventative/safety perspective, though I'm struggling to classify it as a security issue, given that collections are always named by the code and not from user input.Am I missing something?True - but not the case with the server-group.It is a collection node, still has it's own label.Ahh, yes.--Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company--Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company