Re: Query tool data grid - Infinite scroll vs Pagination

public inbox for [email protected]  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed

From: Aditya Toshniwal <[email protected]>
To: pgadmin-hackers <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Query tool data grid - Infinite scroll vs Pagination
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2024 18:16:20 +0530
Message-ID: <CAM9w-_kB2ym2RoU==1=kmBHtABbVJv5azxFwioEnMZVZ6iehSw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAG8xnicRwc5JyCBHgsDi-kD5w-AYBt86-C-yQeZBmuYjsy1Lmg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAM9w-_mJkHpqE2BSdBsLqOVO4ARaWPDXZGYb5Hn3eMh+sDcOrg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+OCxozbRmSmRytM2_4_gNvbpqrX0fEyfFVzYPVWH8ftxHchrQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAM9w-_n6Eo2SBPMjF-SD1NoWD7_RkhKk+=bPC4sYf3QYOP1wog@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAM9w-_n2zyK-fGYKedi59Z_t3-6LTfZeD0_Bgz4EWXhrS6=Zuw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CANVC+REpfUds0p7intQAwg64=NDk=TQK4HYjri68sy1QqKKDWg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAj2gHxghgC1Q7XyyzprNjxuXkLJ3_OZH83dN6w33sXOQEyO3A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAM9w-_n+Bw_LULacX9CSDzdUK4Rm0QgqnpThiAa53W-0rqV0pg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAM9w-_mWgZZJskhxr7p3ABvDwdEM=FfGPKfkuBK8jom7wuzrVQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CPVP215MB18231B703A8AAA097C74D49FCFB32@CPVP215MB1823.LAMP215.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
	<CAG8xnicRwc5JyCBHgsDi-kD5w-AYBt86-C-yQeZBmuYjsy1Lmg@mail.gmail.com>

Hello Everyone,

Just want to share the progress on this. Attached is a quick demo. It is
not complete yet, but I just want to make sure I'm in the right direction.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1B7DuD2Wx2SABGPEEjc8o4RwYcNgu1t_s/view?usp=sharing

On Sat, Aug 3, 2024 at 7:39 PM Gus Spier <[email protected]> wrote:

> I like the idea of gmail behavior.
>
> Regards,
>
> Gus Spier
>
> On Sat, Aug 3, 2024 at 5:45 AM Edson Richter <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Love it!
>> I believe the Gmail behavior is a good approach.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> ER
>>
>>
>> Obter o Outlook para Android <https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg;
>> ------------------------------
>> *From:* Aditya Toshniwal <[email protected]>
>> *Sent:* Friday, August 2, 2024 3:53:33 AM
>> *To:* pgadmin-hackers <[email protected]>
>> *Cc:* Usman Khan <[email protected]>; pgAdmin Support <
>> [email protected]>; Dave Page <[email protected]>; Dave
>> Caughey <[email protected]>
>> *Subject:* Re: Query tool data grid - Infinite scroll vs Pagination
>>
>>
>> Hi Hackers,
>>
>>
>> I have come up with the following design, which allows:
>>
>> 1. Adjust the range of rows visible, aka Window.
>>
>> 2. Jump to a page number directly based on rows window size.
>>
>> 3. Pagination buttons to move forward and backward.
>>
>>
>> My question is, how should "select all" behave now? Previously we used to
>> fetch all the rows when select all was clicked which actually slowed down
>> as it took time for large data.
>>
>> Maybe add a new button to virtually "Select All Rows".
>>
>>
>> [image: image (15).png]
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 2, 2024 at 6:16 PM Aditya Toshniwal <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Thank you Dave and others for your valuable feedback.
>> We'll try to achieve what is best for the users.
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 2, 2024 at 5:46 PM Dave Caughey <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> I think there's a nice blend between pagination and infinite scrolling.
>>
>> The problem with the *current *infinite scrolling implementation is that
>> the scroll baris scaled to the number of *rendered* rows, so as you scroll
>> down (which renders another bunch of records), it keeps rescaling the
>> scrollbar, so to get the next "page", you have to continually move to the
>> scrollbar (as Aditya says, "*Many users who want access in between rows
>> or last row struggle to do it as the user has to scroll and scroll.*")
>>
>> If instead the scrollbar were scaled to the total number of rows, (e.g.,
>> 1000 rather than the initial 25 rows that were rendered), then clicking
>> (say) in the lower third of the scrollbar would would do enough
>> fetching/rendering to display rows 601-625 (or such).  Problem solved.
>>
>> Alternatively (or additionally), provide a "jump to row..." button
>> (similar to what Usman is suggesting re pagination) that gives the user
>> control to see a specific bunch of records quickly.
>>
>> But if the issue is that people don't like infinite scrolling because
>> "the user has to scroll and scroll", then fix that specific UE issue, and
>> people will be happy.
>>
>> The concern I have with a paginated solution is if the page represents
>> the maximum number of rows rendered in the results pane, at any one time.
>> Assume I can see 25 rows in the result pane.  I.e., you show rows 1-25 for
>> the first page, then you *only *show rows 26-50 for the second page,
>> then *only *show rows 27-50, etc. But when there is a cluster of records
>> of interest between rows 640 and 655, then those records of interest are
>> going to be spread between pages 25 and 26, and will constantly require
>> flipping back and forth between pages.  This would be possibly worse UE
>> than the current "user has to scroll and scroll" issue.  On the other hand,
>> if your pagination solution includes letting someone nudge the rendered
>> rows up or down a bit so that I can see rows 640-655 all at once (e.g.,
>> there's a field where I can type in that the current page should start at
>> row 635, so I can see rows 640-655 all together), then I'm fine with that.
>>
>> However, if ultimately you decide to toss out infinite scrolling for
>> pagination, then please make the (default?) page size be the number of rows
>> you can actually see in the result pane, rather than some arbitrary number
>> (e.g., 50).  Having the page size equal to the number of rendered rows
>> means I can quickly step through the pages and hopefully notice a record of
>> interest.... If the page size is larger than the number of rendered rows,
>> then as I step to the next page I *still *have to scroll down to see the
>> last few rows, then step to the next page, then scroll down again,  I.e.,
>> that would be hideous UE!
>>
>> So my vote preferences are:
>>
>> First choice: keep infinite scrolling, but simply fix the scrollbar
>> scaling and/or give the user the means to quickly jump down by a page or to
>> a specific page
>> Second choice: use pagination, but *only *if there's the ability to see
>> a specific chunk of records on a single page (rather than spread across
>> two), and make the pagination size default to the number of records visible
>> given the height of the result pane
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Dave
>>
>>
>> On Mon, 1 Jul 2024 at 04:35, Usman Khan <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Aditya
>> I vote for pagination, it would really be helpful for end users.
>> In addition to giving the user the ability to set page size, if he can
>> also select or enter what page he can jump to say 501, 990 etc it would be
>> helpful.
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 3:44 PM Aditya Toshniwal <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Unfortunately, there were only 3 responses to this.
>> In that case, we will discuss internally and decide what to do.
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 2:46 PM Aditya Toshniwal <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Everyone,
>>
>> Request you to share your opinion on this and respond on:
>>
>> https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSdfJhNK8qXSe9mKcubZa8jjjYl0hiZVxhv6GGJo8WJcYc27ug/viewform?...
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 1:36 PM Dave Page <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 at 13:42, Aditya Toshniwal <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Hackers,
>>
>> Query tool data grid currently pulls the data on load basis in batches.
>> For example, it will initially load only 1000 rows and once a user scrolls
>> to the 1000th row, it will fetch the next batch of 1000.
>> Many users who want access in between rows or last row struggle to do it
>> as the user has to scroll and scroll. If someone grabs the scroller and
>> pulls it down still it will be a good UX and the scrollbar may jump. One
>> reported here - https://github.com/pgadmin-org/pgadmin4/issues/1780
>> One more aspect to this is the in memory data of the query tool which
>> keep on increasing on each scroll, it affects the performance.
>>
>> I propose we should use pagination instead of infinite scroll with the
>> following advantages:
>> 1. Users can jump to any page they want.
>> 2. Users can change the page size on the grid directly.
>> 3. Memory will be used only for visible rows so performance improvement.
>> 4. Predictable UI, no jumping scrollbars.
>>
>> Let me know what you think.
>>
>>
>>
>> I think there are definite benefits, but there is the downside of having
>> to scroll and click to browse results. Personally I'm fine with that, but I
>> think you should probably poll pgadmin-support for opinions from more users.
>>
>> --
>> Dave Page
>> pgAdmin: https://www.pgadmin.org
>> PostgreSQL: https://www.postgresql.org
>> EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Thanks,
>> Aditya Toshniwal
>> pgAdmin Hacker | Sr. Software Architect | *enterprisedb.com*
>> <https://www.enterprisedb.com/;
>> "Don't Complain about Heat, Plant a TREE"
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Thanks,
>> Aditya Toshniwal
>> pgAdmin Hacker | Sr. Software Architect | *enterprisedb.com*
>> <https://www.enterprisedb.com/;
>> "Don't Complain about Heat, Plant a TREE"
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Thanks,
>> Aditya Toshniwal
>> pgAdmin Hacker | Sr. Software Architect | *enterprisedb.com*
>> <https://www.enterprisedb.com/;
>> "Don't Complain about Heat, Plant a TREE"
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Thanks,
>> Aditya Toshniwal
>> pgAdmin Hacker | Sr. Software Architect | *enterprisedb.com*
>> <https://www.enterprisedb.com/;
>> "Don't Complain about Heat, Plant a TREE"
>>
>

-- 
Thanks,
Aditya Toshniwal
pgAdmin Hacker | Sr. Software Architect | *enterprisedb.com*
<https://www.enterprisedb.com/;
"Don't Complain about Heat, Plant a TREE"


Attachments:

  [image/png] image (15).png (172.0K, 3-image%20%2815%29.png)
  download | view image

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected]
  Subject: Re: Query tool data grid - Infinite scroll vs Pagination
  In-Reply-To: <CAM9w-_kB2ym2RoU==1=kmBHtABbVJv5azxFwioEnMZVZ6iehSw@mail.gmail.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox