public inbox for [email protected]help / color / mirror / Atom feed
Building server without Apache 3+ messages / 3 participants [nested] [flat]
* Building server without Apache @ 2017-01-12 02:12 Josh Berkus <[email protected]> 2017-01-12 03:55 ` Re: Building server without Apache Dave Page <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Josh Berkus @ 2017-01-12 02:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: pgadmin-hackers Pgadmin gurus: I'm trying to create a canonical container image for pgAdmin4 Server. However, using Apache is kind of heavyweight for a container. Has anyone run pgAdmin4 against something lighter weight? -- Josh Berkus Containers & Databases Oh My! -- Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-hackers ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Building server without Apache 2017-01-12 02:12 Building server without Apache Josh Berkus <[email protected]> @ 2017-01-12 03:55 ` Dave Page <[email protected]> 2017-01-12 05:50 ` Re: Building server without Apache Magnus Hagander <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Dave Page @ 2017-01-12 03:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Josh Berkus <[email protected]>; +Cc: pgadmin-hackers On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 7:42 AM, Josh Berkus <[email protected]> wrote: > Pgadmin gurus: > > I'm trying to create a canonical container image for pgAdmin4 Server. > However, using Apache is kind of heavyweight for a container. Has > anyone run pgAdmin4 against something lighter weight? If memory serves, the reason why we recommend Apache is that at the time I last tested, it was the only one of Apache, Lighttpd and Nginx which would support single-process, multi-thread WSGI apps. Having a single process is essential, due to the global connection manager used by pgAdmin - it's the only way we can guarantee affinity between the user session and the database session. If you can make that work with servers other than Apache (someone recently suggested Gunicorn might be able to help), then I'd love to hear about it. There are no other special requirements of pgAdmin, so really that's all that stands in your way. -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-hackers ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Building server without Apache 2017-01-12 02:12 Building server without Apache Josh Berkus <[email protected]> 2017-01-12 03:55 ` Re: Building server without Apache Dave Page <[email protected]> @ 2017-01-12 05:50 ` Magnus Hagander <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Magnus Hagander @ 2017-01-12 05:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dave Page <[email protected]>; +Cc: Josh Berkus <[email protected]>; pgadmin-hackers On Jan 12, 2017 4:56 AM, "Dave Page" <[email protected]> wrote: On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 7:42 AM, Josh Berkus <[email protected]> wrote: > Pgadmin gurus: > > I'm trying to create a canonical container image for pgAdmin4 Server. > However, using Apache is kind of heavyweight for a container. Has > anyone run pgAdmin4 against something lighter weight? If memory serves, the reason why we recommend Apache is that at the time I last tested, it was the only one of Apache, Lighttpd and Nginx which would support single-process, multi-thread WSGI apps. Having a single process is essential, due to the global connection manager used by pgAdmin - it's the only way we can guarantee affinity between the user session and the database session. If you can make that work with servers other than Apache (someone recently suggested Gunicorn might be able to help), then I'd love to hear about it. There are no other special requirements of pgAdmin, so really that's all that stands in your way. Uwsgi might also be worth investigating. It's pretty light and supports an hybrid model where ISTM it would work if you just set number of processes to 1 (but I haven't tried it with pgadmin specifically. /Magnus ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-01-12 05:50 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2017-01-12 02:12 Building server without Apache Josh Berkus <[email protected]> 2017-01-12 03:55 ` Dave Page <[email protected]> 2017-01-12 05:50 ` Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox