Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1uuCVx-004Y4F-H0 for pgadmin-support@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 04 Sep 2025 16:08:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1uuCVv-000CPk-RX for pgadmin-support@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 04 Sep 2025 16:08:44 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1uuCVv-000CNs-HG for pgadmin-support@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 04 Sep 2025 16:08:44 +0000 Received: from mail-lf1-x133.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::133]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1uuCVt-000X4F-2w for pgadmin-support@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 04 Sep 2025 16:08:42 +0000 Received: by mail-lf1-x133.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-55ce508d4d6so1063685e87.0 for ; Thu, 04 Sep 2025 09:08:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1757002115; x=1757606915; darn=lists.postgresql.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=qaf0GX+bUJq/TKAbY28GhLTprLl6VqR2SHcvEr2bNGA=; b=H8wgBXL347z/b5O0v5Dm0P9y0+14625s7TJY9Ptu5GmhvbBEl1lrQgwQPVFEt9pZVf LgeSRNXJi338BwxUgpjJis38TX8t/9WMSJC2vee72vr0HsqdzCdzm7n3Y1+swYiu9UXA 1/uG19xWUvGibXu4bSsJa4iwiofGDxEA5jTBjvIMUzj6F9OkKj0IItMLXuPbnW/FY5cd qsg0HergB3Pntugdl4VhP2GtQ2bKDudke120T+MHIfheFicufwYWhxiICcOVhgdcsHYJ AZXsZFl2UGJyGnEoR6WiX2Rxgi6dwGgKVqQou0OTJjjLGDYDjxIwF3tL/FD8UIGuhsFb ErCg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1757002115; x=1757606915; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=qaf0GX+bUJq/TKAbY28GhLTprLl6VqR2SHcvEr2bNGA=; b=srBsbXesBMDcH5L2fcHC/Ph0BUOSMmHsoo4tjnNMCaGlcgue6FY7TJWvQY8zUJAGB/ Ya7E6R6NXUwG+PBp+YGyZX5Oj6OF5KNqC0B0vM8K73IrromgmFERn7ANmPirw1ClZR0k m4r2wt7PiqoEEL6V6cczSCevDBr+Q2ZPSMSlArzsc1I69YT34fK/3yAY9PTh9S8zMZom qRawJ8yR3xRNB4d40le99GL7ekl8jMJkC04GpI+BjQp48OgE1l2Ao4Id2k64IUiiuHHk 4vh4u36VleF8gynI2GU8jCVhJIjqlT2G5xVaQpkwO/Ecg3R+tGmYpVw90FTGsuHIws3B b4Qw== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXA93C1CFI+FbWpta59ZQ9rKhdGPIEox/ywHGJUiBgl99Ht3DQMszTgvsVpa45T0n+lbPuyrHOcUuvTwMGdbfU=@lists.postgresql.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwSuMSl5z/TAVxDExmizoUPF6bqyZ4Zw8HZjAvyvwwuFvAAU1Y6 hPEsLr2x7TpAet+Dztx83U8piyiZo4Y7sL6ponVn1nHRnELR0xcRUUcxmBMO/5fL8wW2OlMtTN9 U9riUUU/jrtDiX14IttYFCpjGAUpm/JY= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnctasXB8KmBh7RGX7bdLyC7+N6P3LMebAvs/5yOoSSkuXZacum7qBBpYiHztzcD OxAtT5wUIpS/SngVplpwv2yLFiFwVFwK6gmciaymapeJ+EYry9ELlIxDWTNDHiah05icHEX8/m3 mmGE+4QRF/o+SpcQ92B/ZJHLQWY+J7F1HmM/sjmKCehXhSEWBl4nOz7dtWqr7CqHxFO9RjO942g 4JO+H6G/BSLdhnoJDQ3fYgndIdpsoeUOHy66os= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IE5HpjpnaFH2Ffo4Aeo091jAM06Wjgp4Wn/zOADM5h2HrUd2kqQcfyVM5nerKUyRdh2mDfCn7xyEAf9alh1u2w= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:1393:b0:55f:4506:a638 with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-55f7093e990mr5988549e87.41.1757002114856; Thu, 04 Sep 2025 09:08:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Apple Pine Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2025 18:08:23 +0200 X-Gm-Features: Ac12FXwNZL_tLXVXry5Dv_B0oUf3WnzlLL7hvBoeYOu5wR-1kndPu_AoX9hf_hU Message-ID: Subject: Re: pgAdmin 4? To: Ashesh Vashi , pgadmin-support@lists.postgresql.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ecf9b6063dfbeedb" List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk --000000000000ecf9b6063dfbeedb Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I forgot how mailing lists work. So pgAdmin III uses C++ and wxWidgets and pgAdmin 4 uses web-based technologies? That's interesting but the question is, will there be a pgAdmin 5? If a web based model is the future, then why shouldn't we say pgAdmin v10 or simply pgAdmin 10? My question should lead to another question: Will there be a pgAdmin 5? Sincerely Am Fr., 29. Aug. 2025 um 08:35 Uhr schrieb Ashesh Vashi < ashesh.vashi@enterprisedb.com>: > On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 11:42=E2=80=AFPM Apple Pine > wrote: > >> hello, >> >> why do you name the software pgAdmin 4 v9.7. >> >> in most cases pgAdmin 3 is too old therefore pgAdmin 4 is the most use >> tool for postgres. it's confusing if you write pgAdmin 4 and then the >> version number. >> >> it should be able to understand what pgAdmin 9.7 means. it means pgAdmin >> 4 in the version 9.7. I suggest you to change the name of pgAdmin 4 at >> least in version 10. >> >> so instead of pgAdmin 4 v10 simply write pgAdmin 10. >> > There is a history behind everything. :) > Please find the blog from Dave Page: > https://pgsnake.blogspot.com/2014/12/the-story-of-pgadmin.html > > This is the fourth revision of pgAdmin, hence - pgAdmin 4. > And - rest are the current version of this edition. > > -- Ashesh > >> >> Sincerely >> > --000000000000ecf9b6063dfbeedb Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I forgot how mailing lists work.

=
So pgAdmin III uses C++ and wxWidgets and pgAdmin 4 uses web-bas= ed technologies?

That's interesting but the question= is, will there be a pgAdmin 5? If a=C2=A0web based model is the future, th= en why shouldn't we say pgAdmin v10 or simply pgAdmin 10?
My question should lead to another question: Will there be a pg= Admin 5?

Sincerely

Am Fr., 29. Aug. 2025 um 08:35=C2=A0Uhr schrieb Ashesh Vashi <ashesh.vashi@enterprisedb.co= m>:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 11:42=E2=80=AFPM = Apple Pine <= applesolvent@gmail.com> wrote:
hello,

why do you name the software pgAdmin 4 = v9.7.

in most cases pgAdmin 3 is too old therefore= pgAdmin 4 is the most use tool for postgres. it's confusing=C2=A0if yo= u write pgAdmin 4 and then the version number.=C2=A0

it should be able to understand what pgAdmin 9.7 means. it means pgAdmin= 4 in the version 9.7. I suggest you to change the name of pgAdmin 4 at lea= st in version 10.

so instead of pgAdmin 4 v10 simp= ly write pgAdmin 10.
There is a history = behind everything. :)
Please find the blog from Dave Page:=C2=A0https://pgsnake.blogspot.com/2014/12/the-story-of-pgadmin.html<= /a>

This is the fourth revision of pgAdmin, hence - pgAdmin 4.
=
And - rest are the current version of this edition.

-- Ashesh

Sincerely
--000000000000ecf9b6063dfbeedb--