Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1ugOBD-002LgB-H9 for pgadmin-support@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 28 Jul 2025 13:46:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1ugOBC-0080yc-4Z for pgadmin-support@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 28 Jul 2025 13:46:14 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1ugNn8-007k8I-JG for pgadmin-support@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 28 Jul 2025 13:21:22 +0000 Received: from mail-lj1-x22f.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::22f]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1ugNn6-001D9F-2G for pgadmin-support@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 28 Jul 2025 13:21:21 +0000 Received: by mail-lj1-x22f.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-32b4876dfecso54017951fa.1 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2025 06:21:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1753708878; x=1754313678; darn=lists.postgresql.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:to:subject:message-id:date:from :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=7lK1SZlffwv2v6lGQNh02hntHrnd5fJItN9kw3jYSV0=; b=VQAC7ziWCQeox5/dDW5yXrIBY6wzTkZhJL2Qz1nYnX0RMiGp4ypysqiFVgDFuWYc8n 3BH8rj0Dy1ltRq21FirbX4d67phdJA2kCVPzaERAZQyQCloCRhPj/31gzocirZ/yFiGK iVYv45WgPJBhJRo0dyF8F9BoHf4EWbE4MNaLguhaf4M+WVu9bPALMPWlWLoUMSRYJDmR pqBjgbQvQUNJ9gr2tCXouQWgPOXCA1r+enxqBxF9TCH9fKDdU7MsPw8fU/ZncfZ8aUZT iqougiNFJJQk1ZWi36eO17yxIktDkADTwuJ+uxayczE0yKbDjn/+hy4tE1XqaznCQ14E Ob7w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1753708878; x=1754313678; h=content-transfer-encoding:to:subject:message-id:date:from :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=7lK1SZlffwv2v6lGQNh02hntHrnd5fJItN9kw3jYSV0=; b=QJ2ymCpQbUcJ8MYWBQZkhvLV/aD2Qij5FnRBHMyeq+yzCxoDED6UsRJgl+sVV+CBTV PGBGqOYJt4tjsbcGB+9yePVmSZ0yvxLcGqroyJCvMAlXS0BHBoTJovTM8zAtV531lVqf XGXPSqB5cYH92KOajlGNFlTV5pBz5KJrp06+aV+ehWB4iFxcytA7AQYA8QNLb2XFR3Ev Mtxqr6dcEF3W1Cea9kqRD0OmuEDLa3BDxXbv6IC2C4WqwJDeGfIOCDtoR2ohlG/AxG0X LPUDxnTaIPEvbXoAUVEeF9Zr4FuvU6kg9F8/91VtIZ5UqEao6uxahin//uAH22dHnSpQ qJbA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwOgPinysNR0TWrDz88XV/3fLJ/RHFpJfBxPgUDbgkw+A81FtCt 4tPbGRSqe+7BwNW/mmPKeMsSe9t49BiG2GyfCwEsFVBSeOlEoyIiznpksvWWh7oYHelhLEpSteX yCd7yzwcekF0UuCjY+xFJCygVTsAtWmy7EXtFY0vBdQ== X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnctNrIexTJe7QSYojG3qZJLG+ut3xSmxh44BqClYmqRY7HjXOVHlida9UiL2p2K 0Z6ixXsf5WjHk72ti01xR7ZfhWujmaVwMia4MCAn9o1QxOOmBBO+tghnRTmk5SSVTKsOfnxcUOF TvvO9oScdYO/ZACrWGZlELWmmPqlTLOJI4fMKHzfsuIqgtvb6XyZnxgehHqhASZWgRbGUe2V/T2 HJJfw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFi6HN8VzAKYJBgw10phNEvJJwTMfta2MTQHQE6Sw91Gju0mj4HPCDTWGc8C/v60pIBz16ep7Y1PEexf/pgkkc= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:a808:0:b0:32a:6e20:7cdf with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-331ee2a656amr39803941fa.4.1753708878106; Mon, 28 Jul 2025 06:21:18 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Abhinav Patni Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2025 18:51:06 +0530 X-Gm-Features: Ac12FXwvpjST_Lu9HzZkFynJI4dwokp2Tr35FeSd9oKX4tWp3CijgHeF69Mtk_8 Message-ID: Subject: Request to Remove Unused xmin Column from Function Properties Queries To: pgadmin-support@lists.postgresql.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Dear pgAdmin Team, Queries for the xmin system column are causing errors and breaking function/property dialogs. I see xmin is fetched in property queries (e.g.,=E2=80=AFfunctions/templates/*/properties.sql) but is always ignored = in processing, as in: web/pgadmin/browser/server_groups/servers/databases/schemas/functions/init.= py: keys_to_ignore =3D ['oid', 'proowner', 'typnsp', 'xmin', =E2=80=A6] Can we drop xmin from these queries? Are there reasons to keep it? If not, would you accept a patch to remove it? Thanks, Abhinav Patni