pgjdbc/pgjdbc GitHub issues and pull requests (mirror)
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: findepi (@findepi) <[email protected]>
To: pgjdbc/pgjdbc <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [pgjdbc/pgjdbc] issue #1225: Java 8 Time Support for Postgres Arrays
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 11:38:51 +0000
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
@davecramer AFAIU, PostgreSQL `timestamp [without time zone]` and Java `LocalDateTime` are both unrelated to any time zone (session, client's, server's).
Time zones are implicated only because JDBC wants you to use `java.sql.Timestamp` which (AFAICT) is always interpreted in correspondence to JVM zone. (This has inherent pitfalls: `java.sql.Timestamp` cannot represent (zone-less) date/time where JVM has forward DST change or forward policy change.)
I've investigated this in Presto SQL (https://github.com/prestosql/presto/issues/37 & related issues and PRs) and my opinion is that we we should use no time zone at all when handling `timestamp` values and treat them as "year/month/day hour/minute/second/millis" "structs".
(I don't know how this plays with PostgreSQL protocol. This is beyond my knowledge.)
cc @electrum
view thread (16+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: github://pgjdbc/pgjdbc
Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: [pgjdbc/pgjdbc] issue #1225: Java 8 Time Support for Postgres Arrays
In-Reply-To: <<[email protected]>>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox