Message-ID: <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc-194-c1150087040@github.com>
From: "rutchkiwi (@rutchkiwi)" <noreply+rutchkiwi@github.com>
To: "pgjdbc/pgjdbc" <noreply+pgjdbc-pgjdbc@github.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2022 15:42:43 +0000
Subject: Re: [pgjdbc/pgjdbc] issue #194: PgJDBC can experience client/server deadlocks during batch execution
In-Reply-To: <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc-194@github.com>
References: <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc-194@github.com>
List-Id: <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc.github.com>
X-GitHub-Author-Login: rutchkiwi
X-GitHub-Comment-Id: 1150087040
X-GitHub-Comment-Type: issue_comment
X-GitHub-Issue: 194
X-GitHub-Repo: pgjdbc/pgjdbc
X-GitHub-Type: comment
X-GitHub-Url: https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/issues/194#issuecomment-1150087040
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

@rbygrave This is not really a performance sensitive application so I haven't benchmarked different batch sizes. I basically just wanted to not do any batching at all in my application code, to keep things simple. Thanks for your info, if I do run into a situation where the speed does matter I'll try smaller sizes.