Message-ID: <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc-2325-c996872347@github.com>
From: "davecramer (@davecramer)" <noreply+davecramer@github.com>
To: "pgjdbc/pgjdbc" <noreply+pgjdbc-pgjdbc@github.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2021 16:55:12 +0000
Subject: Re: [pgjdbc/pgjdbc] issue #2325: Support pipelining queries
In-Reply-To: <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc-2325@github.com>
References: <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc-2325@github.com>
List-Id: <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc.github.com>
X-GitHub-Author-Login: davecramer
X-GitHub-Comment-Id: 996872347
X-GitHub-Comment-Type: issue_comment
X-GitHub-Issue: 2325
X-GitHub-Repo: pgjdbc/pgjdbc
X-GitHub-Type: comment
X-GitHub-Url: https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/issues/2325#issuecomment-996872347
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

Good catch, I hadn't thought about the batching stuff. It would certainly be non-standard. The question becomes who has the bandwidth to implement this ?