Message-ID: <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc-2861-c3631533666@github.com>
From: "ShenFeng312 (@ShenFeng312)" <noreply+ShenFeng312@github.com>
To: "pgjdbc/pgjdbc" <noreply+pgjdbc-pgjdbc@github.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2025 10:40:41 +0000
Subject: Re: [pgjdbc/pgjdbc] issue #2861: setFetchSize is ignored?
In-Reply-To: <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc-2861@github.com>
References: <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc-2861@github.com>
List-Id: <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc.github.com>
X-GitHub-Author-Login: ShenFeng312
X-GitHub-Comment-Id: 3631533666
X-GitHub-Comment-Type: issue_comment
X-GitHub-Issue: 2861
X-GitHub-Repo: pgjdbc/pgjdbc
X-GitHub-Type: comment
X-GitHub-Url: https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/issues/2861#issuecomment-3631533666
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

I’m curious why we can’t, like MySQL, fetch the next batch of data from the TCP receive buffer only when calling `ResultSet.next()`.@davecramer @vlsi