Message-ID: <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc-2923-c1613251249@github.com>
From: "vlsi (@vlsi)" <noreply+vlsi@github.com>
To: "pgjdbc/pgjdbc" <noreply+pgjdbc-pgjdbc@github.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2023 14:09:43 +0000
Subject: Re: [pgjdbc/pgjdbc] PR #2923: un-deprecate SSL_FACTORY_ARG
In-Reply-To: <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc-2923@github.com>
References: <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc-2923@github.com>
List-Id: <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc.github.com>
X-GitHub-Author-Login: vlsi
X-GitHub-Comment-Id: 1613251249
X-GitHub-Comment-Type: issue_comment
X-GitHub-Issue: 2923
X-GitHub-Repo: pgjdbc/pgjdbc
X-GitHub-Type: comment
X-GitHub-Url: https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/pull/2923#issuecomment-1613251249
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

Yet another possibility is to allow clients to pass `SockerFactory` instances via `sslfactory`, so the code could be

```java
PGProperty.SSL_FACTORY.set(properties, new SingleCertValidatingFactory("..."));
```

Of course, Java's `Properties` discourage passing non-string values, however, it seems to fit here.